• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AAMI SP 10标准与英国高血压学会协议之间血压测量设备的准确性关系。

Accuracy relationship of blood pressure devices between the AAMI SP 10 standard and the British Hypertension Society protocols.

作者信息

Sun M, Jones R

机构信息

Neopath, Inc., Redmond, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Biomed Instrum Technol. 1999 Jan-Feb;33(1):62-70.

PMID:10067181
Abstract

This article analyzes and compares the accuracy requirements for the AAMI SP10 standard and the British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocol for evaluation of blood pressure devices. It generates a theoretical mapping relationship between the AAMI accuracy criteria and the BHS grading system, using these requirements. It locates within that relationship the analyses of blood pressure devices in the literature that have used both of these standards from 1990, when the original BHS protocol was published and the original AAMI SP10 standard was available, through the end of 1997. Comparison of 67 paired entries thus provides a framework for consideration of the concept of accuracy implicit in both systems against empirical testing of devices. Results of accuracy testing with each of the two systems should be consistent and convertible to the other system. The discrepancies between the theoretic combination of accuracy standards and empirical testing for each standard separately suggest a variety of difficulties in determining accuracy, such as statistical variability and test procedure variations. Using a chi-square test for matched samples, the discrepancies are found statistically significantly different (chi-square = 28.96, p < 0.001). Although there are fewer literature reports using the revised BHS protocol, the differences in the two systems suggest a potential need for an international agreement on accuracy determinations of blood pressure devices.

摘要

本文分析并比较了美国医疗器械促进协会(AAMI)SP10标准和英国高血压协会(BHS)血压测量设备评估方案的准确性要求。利用这些要求,得出了AAMI准确性标准与BHS分级系统之间的理论映射关系。在该关系范围内,定位了1990年(即最初的BHS方案发布且最初的AAMI SP10标准可用之时)至1997年底期间文献中同时使用这两种标准的血压测量设备的分析。对67对数据的比较,为对照设备的实证测试来考量这两种系统中隐含的准确性概念提供了一个框架。两种系统各自的准确性测试结果应保持一致且能相互转换。每种标准的准确性标准理论组合与各自的实证测试之间的差异,表明在确定准确性方面存在各种困难,如统计变异性和测试程序差异。使用配对样本卡方检验发现,这些差异在统计学上具有显著差异(卡方 = 28.96,p < 0.001)。尽管使用修订后的BHS方案的文献报告较少,但两种系统之间的差异表明,可能需要就血压测量设备准确性的判定达成国际协议。

相似文献

1
Accuracy relationship of blood pressure devices between the AAMI SP 10 standard and the British Hypertension Society protocols.AAMI SP 10标准与英国高血压学会协议之间血压测量设备的准确性关系。
Biomed Instrum Technol. 1999 Jan-Feb;33(1):62-70.
2
The quest for better validation: a critical comparison of the AAMI and BHS validation protocols for ambulatory blood pressure measurement systems.寻求更好的验证:动态血压测量系统的AAMI和BHS验证方案的关键比较。
Biomed Instrum Technol. 1992 Sep-Oct;26(5):395-9.
3
Evaluation of three devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the revised British Hypertension Society Protocol: the Omron HEM-705CP, Philips HP5332, and Nissei DS-175.根据修订后的英国高血压学会协议对三种自测血压设备的评估:欧姆龙HEM-705CP、飞利浦HP5332和日精DS-175。
Blood Press Monit. 1996 Feb;1(1):55-61.
4
Evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systems.血压测量设备的评估,特别涉及动态血压监测系统。
J Hypertens Suppl. 1990 Dec;8(7):S133-9.
5
A comparison of the British Hypertension Society and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation protocols for validating blood pressure measuring devices: can the two be reconciled?英国高血压学会与医疗仪器促进协会关于验证血压测量设备的方案比较:二者能否协调一致?
J Hypertens. 1994 Sep;12(9):1089-94.
6
Accutracker II (version 30/23) ambulatory blood pressure monitor: clinical validation using the British Hypertension Society and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards.Accutracker II(30/23版本)动态血压监测仪:依据英国高血压学会和医疗仪器促进协会标准进行的临床验证
J Hypertens. 1993 Nov;11(11):1275-82.
7
Evaluation of the SpaceLabs 90202 non-invasive ambulatory recorder according to the AAMI Standard and BHS criteria.根据美国医疗器械促进协会(AAMI)标准和英国高血压学会(BHS)标准对太空实验室90202型无创动态记录仪进行评估。
J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Jun;5(3):223-6.
8
Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a review of validation data.
J Hypertens Suppl. 1990 Dec;8(6):S11-6.
9
Evaluation of the Profilomat II ambulatory blood pressure system according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.根据英国高血压学会和医疗仪器促进协会的协议对Profilomat II动态血压系统进行评估。
Blood Press Monit. 1998;3(6):353-61.
10
Evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices.
Clin Exp Hypertens. 1993 Nov;15(6):1087-97. doi: 10.3109/10641969309037096.

引用本文的文献

1
Practical Application of a New Cuffless Blood Pressure Measurement Method.一种新型无袖带血压测量方法的实际应用
Pathophysiology. 2023 Dec 1;30(4):586-598. doi: 10.3390/pathophysiology30040042.