• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

再探人工颅骨变形与澳大利亚化石

Artificial cranial deformation and fossil Australians revisited.

作者信息

Antón S C, Weinstein K J

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611, USA.

出版信息

J Hum Evol. 1999 Feb;36(2):195-209. doi: 10.1006/jhev.1998.0266.

DOI:10.1006/jhev.1998.0266
PMID:10068066
Abstract

Based on cranial characters shared by Homo erectus in Java and Homo sapiens in Australia, Australasia is widely considered the strongest case for a regional origin of modern humans. However, artificial vault deformation has been suggested to be the cause of "archaic" characters such as frontal recession in key fossil Australian crania. We use log-log plots of cranial arc versus chord measurements and we score nonmetric traits often thought to be associated with artificial deformation to make systematic comparisons across groups and deformation types to identify universal consequences of artificial deformation. Based on our large comparative sample (n = 588) apparatus-deformed crania have flatter frontals and occipitals and usually more angulated parietals in the sagittal plane than undeformed crania, regardless of deformation type. Fossil Australian samples exhibit evidence of both undeformed and deformed individuals. The sample from Coobool Creek provides evidence that undeformed individuals had more rounded frontals than recent Australians. However, many individuals from Coobool Creek, Kow Swamp, and Nacurrie exhibit modification of one or more cranial contours. The Kow Swamp individuals in particular plot with deformed crania from all regions. In addition, the frequency of hyperostotic traits such as bregmatic eminence, metopic and sagittal keels in H. sapiens is influenced by both artificial deformation and pathological hypervascularity/hyperostosis. Thus it is unwise to use cranial contours and these nonmetric traits to infer genetic relatedness between Fossil Australians and Indonesian H. erectus.

摘要

基于爪哇直立人与澳大利亚智人共有的颅骨特征,澳大拉西亚被广泛认为是现代人类区域起源最有力的例证。然而,有人提出人工颅顶变形是澳大利亚关键化石颅骨出现诸如额部后缩等“古老”特征的原因。我们使用颅骨弧与弦测量的对数-对数图,并对通常被认为与人工变形有关的非计量性状进行评分,以便对不同群体和变形类型进行系统比较,从而确定人工变形的普遍影响。基于我们庞大的比较样本(n = 588),无论变形类型如何,经器具变形的颅骨与未变形的颅骨相比,其额部和枕部更扁平,矢状面的顶骨通常更有棱角。澳大利亚化石样本显示出未变形和变形个体的证据。库布尔溪的样本表明,未变形个体的额部比现代澳大利亚人更圆润。然而,来自库布尔溪、科沼泽和纳库里的许多个体都表现出一个或多个颅骨轮廓的改变。尤其是科沼泽的个体与所有地区经变形的颅骨分布在一起。此外,智人中诸如前囟隆起、额缝和矢状嵴等高骨化性状的频率受人工变形和病理性血管增生/骨化的影响。因此,利用颅骨轮廓和这些非计量性状来推断澳大利亚化石与印度尼西亚直立人之间的遗传关系是不明智的。

相似文献

1
Artificial cranial deformation and fossil Australians revisited.再探人工颅骨变形与澳大利亚化石
J Hum Evol. 1999 Feb;36(2):195-209. doi: 10.1006/jhev.1998.0266.
2
Artificial cranial deformation in Pleistocene Australians: the Coobool Creek sample.更新世澳大利亚人的人工颅骨变形:库布尔溪样本
J Hum Evol. 2008 Jun;54(6):795-813. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.10.013. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
3
Artificial cranial deformation in Kow Swamp 1 and 5: a response to Curnoe (2007).科瓦沼泽1号和5号头骨的人工变形:对库尔诺(2007年)的回应
Homo. 2008;59(4):261-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jchb.2008.06.001. Epub 2008 Jul 31.
4
Developmental age and taxonomic affinity of the Mojokerto child, Java, Indonesia.印度尼西亚爪哇莫佐克托儿童的发育年龄和分类学亲缘关系。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1997 Apr;102(4):497-514. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199704)102:4<497::AID-AJPA6>3.0.CO;2-P.
5
Nacurrie 1: Mark of ancient Java, or a caring mother's hands, in terminal Pleistocene Australia?纳库里 1 号:是古代爪哇的印记,还是末次冰期澳大利亚一位慈母的双手?
J Hum Evol. 2010 Aug;59(2):168-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.05.007. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
6
Brief communication: Artificial cranial modification in Kow Swamp and Cohuna.简短通讯:科沃斯沼泽地和科胡纳的人工颅骨变形
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2014 Sep;155(1):173-8. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22563. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
7
The Homo sapiens 'hemibun': its developmental pattern and the problem of homology.智人的“半耳骨”:其发育模式及同源性问题。
Homo. 2009;60(6):489-516. doi: 10.1016/j.jchb.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
8
Recent human evolution in East Asia and Australasia.东亚和澳大拉西亚地区近期的人类进化。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 Aug 29;337(1280):235-42. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1992.0101.
9
Thickened cranial vault and parasagittal keeling: correlated traits and autapomorphies of Homo erectus?颅穹窿增厚和矢状嵴隆起:直立人相关特征和特徵?
J Hum Evol. 2013 Jun;64(6):631-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
10
New Middle Pleistocene hominid crania from Yunxian in China.中国郧县新发现的中更新世人类头骨化石。
Nature. 1992 Jun 4;357(6377):404-7. doi: 10.1038/357404a0.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating intentional cranial modification: A hybridized two-dimensional/three-dimensional study of the Hirota site, Tanegashima, Japan.调查蓄意颅骨改造:日本种子岛 Hirota 遗址的二维/三维杂交研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 16;18(8):e0289219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289219. eCollection 2023.
2
Neandertal-like traits visible in the internal structure of non-supranuchal fossae of some recent Homo sapiens: The problem of their identification in hominins and phylogenetic implications.某些现代人类非颅顶骨窝内部结构中可见似尼安德特人特征:在人属中识别它们的问题及其系统发育意义。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 12;14(3):e0213687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213687. eCollection 2019.
3
A 150-year conundrum: cranial robusticity and its bearing on the origin of aboriginal australians.
一个长达150年的谜题:颅骨粗壮度及其与澳大利亚原住民起源的关系。
Int J Evol Biol. 2011 Jan 20;2011:632484. doi: 10.4061/2011/632484.
4
Artificial cranial deformation in newborns in the pre-Columbian Andes.
Childs Nerv Syst. 2005 Nov;21(11):945-50. doi: 10.1007/s00381-004-1127-8. Epub 2005 Feb 12.
5
Modern human origins: progress and prospects.现代人类起源:进展与展望。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Apr 29;357(1420):563-79. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.1057.