• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意力刺激与编程手的选择:发展视角

Attentional stimuli and programming hand selection: a developmental perspective.

作者信息

Gabbard C, Rabb C, Gentry V

机构信息

Texas A&M University, Department of Health and Kinesiology, College Station 77843-4243, USA.

出版信息

Int J Neurosci. 1998 Dec;96(3-4):205-15. doi: 10.3109/00207459808986468.

DOI:10.3109/00207459808986468
PMID:10069620
Abstract

This experiment examined the use of attentional stimuli for reaching in hemispace by strong right-dominant adults and children. Driving the hypothesis was the notion that developmental factors associated with use of attentional information may affect the programming of reaching movements in hemispace. Although the general pattern of responses was similar for both samples, children did not use attentional cues to program reaching movements in contralateral hemispace as effectively as adults. This result suggests that motor dominance and perhaps other factors were pivotal in motor programming for children. One possible explanation for the general behavior observed underlies an attentional hemispheric bias for a tendency to use the hand that is on the same side as the stimulus.

摘要

本实验研究了强右利手的成年人和儿童在半侧空间中利用注意力刺激进行伸手动作的情况。驱动该假设的观点是,与注意力信息使用相关的发育因素可能会影响半侧空间中伸手动作的编程。尽管两个样本的总体反应模式相似,但儿童在对侧半侧空间中利用注意力线索来编程伸手动作的效果不如成年人。这一结果表明,运动优势以及可能的其他因素在儿童的运动编程中起着关键作用。对所观察到的一般行为的一种可能解释是,存在一种注意力半球偏向,即倾向于使用与刺激在同一侧的手。

相似文献

1
Attentional stimuli and programming hand selection: a developmental perspective.注意力刺激与编程手的选择:发展视角
Int J Neurosci. 1998 Dec;96(3-4):205-15. doi: 10.3109/00207459808986468.
2
What drives children's limb selection for reaching in hemispace?
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Jun;156(3):325-32. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1792-y. Epub 2004 Jan 27.
3
What determines choice of limb for unimanual reaching movements?
J Gen Psychol. 2000 Apr;127(2):178-84. doi: 10.1080/00221300009598577.
4
Attentional effects on reaching in hemispace.
Percept Mot Skills. 1999 Apr;88(2):701-2. doi: 10.2466/pms.1999.88.2.701.
5
Lateralized effects on reaching by children.
Dev Neuropsychol. 2001;19(1):41-51. doi: 10.1207/S15326942DN1901_4.
6
Preferential reaching across regions of hemispace in adults and children.成人和儿童在半侧空间各区域间的优先伸手动作。
Dev Psychobiol. 2006 Mar;48(2):121-32. doi: 10.1002/dev.20120.
7
What determines limb selection for reaching?是什么决定了伸手时对肢体的选择?
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2004 Mar;75(1):47-59. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2004.10609133.
8
Imagined and actual limb selection: a test of preference.
Brain Cogn. 2001 Jun-Jul;46(1-2):139-44. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2626(01)80052-x.
9
Effects of monocular viewing and eye dominance on spatial attention.单眼视觉和眼优势对空间注意力的影响。
Brain. 2002 Sep;125(Pt 9):2023-35. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf210.
10
Left-side infant holding: a test of the hemispheric arousal-attentional hypothesis.
Brain Cogn. 2001 Jun-Jul;46(1-2):159-65. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2626(01)80056-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Sensorimotor faculties bias choice behavior.感觉运动能力会影响选择行为。
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 28;16:1432996. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1432996. eCollection 2025.
2
Sensorimotor faculties bias perceptual decision-making.感觉运动能力会影响知觉决策。
bioRxiv. 2024 May 16:2024.05.14.594024. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.14.594024.
3
Influence of target location, task complexity, and gender on children's use of their preferred foot.目标位置、任务复杂性和性别对儿童使用惯用脚的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2023 Sep;241(9):2241-2247. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06678-7. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
4
Effects of arm weight and target height on hand selection: A low-cost virtual reality paradigm.手臂重量和目标高度对手部选择的影响:一种低成本虚拟现实范式。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 21;14(6):e0207326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207326. eCollection 2019.
5
Cognitive-perceptual load modulates hand selection in left-handers to a greater extent than in right-handers.认知-感知负荷对左利手的手部选择的调节作用比对右利手的调节作用更大。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Feb;237(2):389-399. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5423-z. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
6
Is Hand Selection Modulated by Cognitive-perceptual Load?手的选择是否受到认知知觉负荷的调节?
Neuroscience. 2018 Jan 15;369:363-373. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
7
Hand preference, performance abilities, and hand selection in children.儿童的用手偏好、运动能力和手部选择
Front Psychol. 2014 Feb 18;5:82. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00082. eCollection 2014.
8
Hemispheric differences in the control of limb dynamics: a link between arm performance asymmetries and arm selection patterns.半球间对肢体动力学的控制差异:手臂表现不对称与手臂选择模式之间的联系。
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Feb;109(3):825-38. doi: 10.1152/jn.00885.2012. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
9
From the reaching behavior at 5 months of age to hand preference at preschool age.从5个月大时的够物行为到学龄前的用手偏好。
Dev Psychobiol. 2008 Jul;50(5):511-8. doi: 10.1002/dev.20307.
10
Interactions between lateralized choices of hand and target.手部与目标的偏侧化选择之间的相互作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Apr;170(2):149-59. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0193-9. Epub 2005 Nov 17.