Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA; E. K. Shriver Center of the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.
Neuroscience. 2018 Jan 15;369:363-373. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
Previous studies proposed that selecting which hand to use for a reaching task appears to be modulated by a factor described as "task difficulty". However, what features of a task might contribute to greater or lesser "difficulty" in the context of hand selection decisions has yet to be determined. There has been evidence that biomechanical and kinematic factors such as movement smoothness and work can predict patterns of selection across the workspace, suggesting a role of predictive cost analysis in hand-selection. We hypothesize that this type of prediction for hand-selection should recruit substantial cognitive resources and thus should be influenced by cognitive-perceptual loading. We test this hypothesis by assessing the role of cognitive-perceptual loading on hand selection decisions, using a visual search task that presents different levels of difficulty (cognitive-perceptual load), as established in previous studies on overall response time and efficiency of visual search. Although the data are necessarily preliminary due to small sample size, our data suggested an influence of cognitive-perceptual load on hand selection, such that the dominant hand was selected more frequently as cognitive load increased. Interestingly, cognitive-perceptual loading also increased cross-midline reaches with both hands. Because crossing midline is more costly in terms of kinematic and kinetic factors, our findings suggest that cognitive processes are normally engaged to avoid costly actions, and that the choice not-to-cross midline requires cognitive resources.
先前的研究提出,在选择使用哪只手完成伸手任务时,似乎受到一种被描述为“任务难度”的因素的调节。然而,在进行手选择决策时,哪些任务特征可能导致更大或更小的“难度”,尚未确定。有证据表明,生物力学和运动学因素,如运动平滑度和功,可以预测整个工作空间中的选择模式,这表明在手部选择中存在预测成本分析的作用。我们假设这种手部选择的预测类型应该需要大量的认知资源,因此应该受到认知知觉负荷的影响。我们通过评估认知知觉负荷在手选择决策中的作用来检验这一假设,使用视觉搜索任务来呈现不同的难度水平(认知知觉负荷),这在之前关于整体反应时间和视觉搜索效率的研究中已经确立。尽管由于样本量小,数据必然是初步的,但我们的数据表明认知知觉负荷对手部选择有影响,即随着认知负荷的增加,主导手被选择的频率更高。有趣的是,认知知觉负荷也增加了双手的中线交叉。因为从中线交叉的角度来看,在运动学和动力学因素方面的成本更高,因此我们的发现表明,认知过程通常会被用来避免高成本的动作,而选择不穿过中线则需要认知资源。