• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择行为与决策辅助工具使用中的跨文化差异:日本与美国的比较

Cross-Cultural Differences in Choice Behavior and Use of Decision Aids: A Comparison of Japan and the United States.

作者信息

Chu PC, Spires EE, Sueyoshi T

机构信息

Fisher College of Business, Department of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Ohio State University

出版信息

Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Feb;77(2):147-170. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2817.

DOI:10.1006/obhd.1998.2817
PMID:10069944
Abstract

A controlled laboratory study was conducted to investigate the effect of cultural differences on decision strategy. Participants from two cultures (Japan and the United States) completed multi-attribute preferential choice tasks with and without use of computerized decision aids. The results indicate that Japanese participants were less likely to invoke compensatory decision processes, which involve conflict-confronting assessment of trade-offs among attributes. This behavior is consistent with some cultural differences described in extant literature. The results call into question the generalizability across cultures of descriptive decision theories, which come largely from the West, and suggest the need for descriptive theories that incorporate cultural factors. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

摘要

一项对照实验室研究旨在调查文化差异对决策策略的影响。来自两种文化(日本和美国)的参与者完成了有或没有使用计算机化决策辅助工具的多属性偏好选择任务。结果表明,日本参与者较少可能采用补偿性决策过程,这种过程涉及对属性间权衡的冲突对抗评估。这种行为与现有文献中描述的一些文化差异相一致。这些结果对主要源自西方的描述性决策理论在不同文化中的通用性提出了质疑,并表明需要纳入文化因素的描述性理论。版权所有1999年学术出版社。

相似文献

1
Cross-Cultural Differences in Choice Behavior and Use of Decision Aids: A Comparison of Japan and the United States.选择行为与决策辅助工具使用中的跨文化差异:日本与美国的比较
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Feb;77(2):147-170. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2817.
2
Contingent Weighting in Self-Other Decision Making.自我与他人决策中的权变加权
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2000 Sep;83(1):82-106. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2903.
3
A cross-cultural survey of residents' perceived barriers in questioning/challenging authority.一项关于居民在质疑/挑战权威方面所感知到的障碍的跨文化调查。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Aug;15(4):277-83. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.017368.
4
Acculturation and end-of-life decision making: comparison of Japanese and Japanese-American focus groups.文化适应与临终决策:日本和日裔美国人焦点小组的比较
Bioethics. 2007 Jun;21(5):251-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00551.x.
5
Coping with Unfavorable Attribute Values in Choice.应对选择中不利的属性值。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2000 Mar;81(2):274-299. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2872.
6
Differences in care-seeking behavior for acute chest pain in the United States and Japan.
Am Heart J. 2004 Apr;147(4):630-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.10.006.
7
Homogeneity of effect sizes for sex across spatial tests and cultures: implications for hormonal theories.
Brain Cogn. 1996 Jun;31(1):90-4. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1996.0027.
8
Cultural affordances and emotional experience: socially engaging and disengaging emotions in Japan and the United States.文化可供性与情感体验:日本和美国的社交参与和脱离情感
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(5):890-903. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.890.
9
Cross-cultural generalizability of the theory of planned behavior among young people in a physical activity context.计划行为理论在体育活动背景下的年轻人中的跨文化普遍性。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007 Feb;29(1):2-20.
10
Managing Workplace Conflict in the United States and Hong Kong.美国和香港地区职场冲突的管理
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2001 Jul;85(2):360-381. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2944.

引用本文的文献

1
Human Cognition Through the Lens of Social Engineering Cyberattacks.从社会工程网络攻击视角看人类认知
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 30;11:1755. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01755. eCollection 2020.
2
Culture and decision making.文化与决策
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2016 Sep;136:106-118. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
3
Ensuring Cultural and Cognitive Integrity in Instrument Translation: Quality of Life Index for Japanese Cancer Patients.确保工具翻译中的文化和认知完整性:日本癌症患者生活质量指数
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Jan-Mar;6(1):64-71. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_57_18.