How physician executives and clinicians perceive ethical issues in Saudi Arabian hospitals.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the perceptions of physician executives and clinicians regarding ethical issues in Saudi Arabian hospitals and the attributes that might lead to the existence of these ethical issues.

DESIGN

Self-completion questionnaire administered from February to July 1997.

SETTING

Different health regions in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

PARTICIPANTS

Random sample of 457 physicians (317 clinicians and 140 physician executives) from several hospitals in various regions across the kingdom.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in the perceptions of physician executives and clinicians regarding the existence of various ethical issues in their hospitals. The vast majority of physician executives did not perceive that seven of the eight issues addressed by the study were ethical concerns in their hospitals. However, the majority of the clinicians perceived that six of the same eight issues were ethical considerations in their hospitals. Statistically significant differences in the perceptions of physician executives and clinicians were observed in only three out of eight attributes that might possibly lead to the existence of ethical issues. The most significant attribute that was perceived to result in ethical issues was that of hospitals having a multinational staff.

CONCLUSION

The study calls for the formulation of a code of ethics that will address specifically the physicians who work in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. As a more immediate initiative, it is recommended that seminars and workshops be conducted to provide physicians with an opportunity to discuss the ethical dilemmas they face in their medical practice.