Benfenati E, Pierucci P, Fanelli R, Preiss A, Godejohann M, Astratov M, Levsen K, Barceló D
Dipartimento Ambiente e Salute, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri Milan, Italy.
J Chromatogr A. 1999 Jan 29;831(2):243-56. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(98)00949-2.
Nowadays, the need to have a realistic characterization of industrial effluents in the environment has become more and more recognized. A palette of different analytical methods both for sample extraction and instrumental analysis are available today, some older, others introduced more recently. The aim of this research is to compare a number of these techniques. To do this we studied a real leachate from an industrial landfill and carried out chemical analyses for organic pollutants, using different extraction methods based on solid-phase extraction and solid-phase microextraction and different instrumental techniques such as GC-MS, LC-MS, NMR and LC-NMR. Results show the performances of the different techniques, which are complementary.
如今,对环境中工业废水进行实际表征的需求已越来越得到认可。如今有一系列用于样品萃取和仪器分析的不同分析方法,有些是较旧的方法,有些是最近才引入的。本研究的目的是比较其中一些技术。为此,我们研究了来自工业垃圾填埋场的实际渗滤液,并使用基于固相萃取和固相微萃取的不同萃取方法以及气相色谱 - 质谱联用(GC-MS)、液相色谱 - 质谱联用(LC-MS)、核磁共振(NMR)和液相色谱 - 核磁共振联用(LC-NMR)等不同仪器技术对有机污染物进行了化学分析。结果显示了不同技术的性能,这些技术具有互补性。