Dietrich T, Lösche A C, Lösche G M, Roulet J F
Department of Periodontology and Synoptic Dentistry, Humboldt-University, Berlin, Germany.
J Dent. 1999 Feb;27(2):119-28. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(98)00035-9.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the marginal adaptation of direct Class II sandwich restorations with resin-modified glass-ionomer cements and compomers in comparison to base and total bond restorations. For sandwich restorations with a triple cure resin-modified glass-ionomer cement the influence of different light curing techniques was also evaluated.
Large butt-joint class II cavities with cervical margins 1 mm below the cemento-enamel junction were cut into 120 extracted human molars. The cavities (15 groups, n = 8) were filled using a sandwich, base or total bond technique with materials from five different manufacturers. A three-sited light curing technique was used in 13 groups. For the material combination Vitremer/Z100 two additional groups with a different wand positioning and a metal matrix were evaluated. After water storage for 21 days and thermocycling (2000x, 5-55 degrees C), replicas were quantitatively analysed in the SEM. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Bonferroni test at p < 0.05.
The marginal adaptation of vertical enamel margins was not dependent on the restorative technique. For margins in dentine, marginal adaptation was significantly better with the sandwich technique than with a base or total bond technique for all materials. There were no significant differences between the base and total bond technique. Overall, resin-modified glass-ionomer cements showed somewhat better results than compomers in sandwich restorations, though differences were not significant for some criteria. Vitremer/Z100 sandwich restorations applied with a metal matrix showed the highest mean percentage of excellent margins of all experimental groups.
Both resin-modified glass-ionomer cements and compomers can improve the marginal quality when used in a sandwich technique. Further research is necessary to determine the ideal material combination for sandwich restorations.
本研究旨在评估树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和复合体直接Ⅱ类夹层修复体与基底修复体和全粘结修复体相比的边缘适应性。对于使用三重固化树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的夹层修复体,还评估了不同光固化技术的影响。
在120颗拔除的人类磨牙上制备颈部边缘位于牙骨质-釉质界下方1mm的大型对接Ⅱ类洞。将这些洞(15组,每组n = 8)采用夹层、基底或全粘结技术,用来自五个不同制造商的材料进行充填。13组使用三点光固化技术。对于Vitremer/Z100材料组合,另外评估了两组采用不同光棒位置和金属基质的情况。在储存21天并进行热循环(2000次,5 - 55℃)后,在扫描电子显微镜下对复制体进行定量分析。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Bonferroni检验进行统计学分析,p < 0.05。
垂直釉质边缘的边缘适应性不依赖于修复技术。对于牙本质边缘,所有材料采用夹层技术时的边缘适应性明显优于基底或全粘结技术。基底和全粘结技术之间没有显著差异。总体而言,在夹层修复体中,树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的效果略优于复合体,尽管某些标准下差异不显著。采用金属基质的Vitremer/Z100夹层修复体在所有实验组中显示出最高的优秀边缘平均百分比。
树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和复合体在夹层技术中使用时均可改善边缘质量。需要进一步研究以确定夹层修复体的理想材料组合。