Lim C C, Neo J, Yap A
Department of Restorative Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
J Oral Rehabil. 1999 Jan;26(1):48-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00323.x.
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of immediate and delayed finishing on the microleakage of encapsulated resin-modified glass-ionomer, Fuji II LC and a polyacid-modified resin composite, Dyract compomer at both the enamel and dentine margins. Standardized Class V cavities were prepared along the cemento-enamel junction on buccal and palatal surfaces of 24 freshly extracted non-carious premolars. Equal numbers of buccal and palatal cavities in each group were restored with Fuji II LC and Dyract compomer following the manufacturer's instructions. The groups with delayed finishing were restored 1 week earlier, stored in saline at 37 degrees C and finished on the same day as the groups with immediate finishing. The specimens were then thermocycled 500 times and subjected to dye penetration testing. The results showed that both materials leaked more at the dentine than enamel margins for both regimes of finishing methods. There was no statistical difference in the microleakage of Dyract finished immediately or later at enamel and dentine margins and Fuji II LC finished immediately or later in dentine. However, a statistical difference existed between the microleakage in Fuji II LC finished immediately and later in enamel.
本研究的目的是比较即刻修整和延迟修整对两种材料(一种是胶囊型树脂改良玻璃离子水门汀Fuji II LC,另一种是聚酸改性树脂复合体Dyract复合体)在釉质和牙本质边缘微渗漏的影响。在24颗新拔除的无龋前磨牙的颊面和腭面沿牙骨质-釉质界制备标准化的V类洞。每组中数量相等的颊面和腭面洞按照制造商的说明分别用Fuji II LC和Dyract复合体修复。延迟修整组提前1周修复,在37℃的盐水中储存,并与即刻修整组在同一天进行修整。然后将标本进行500次热循环并进行染料渗透测试。结果表明,对于两种修整方法,两种材料在牙本质边缘的渗漏均比在釉质边缘更多。即刻或延迟修整的Dyract在釉质和牙本质边缘的微渗漏以及即刻或延迟修整的Fuji II LC在牙本质的微渗漏之间没有统计学差异。然而,即刻和延迟修整的Fuji II LC在釉质中的微渗漏之间存在统计学差异。