Geary J L, Kinirons M J
School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University of Belfast, Royal Victoria Hospital, UK.
J Dent. 1999 Feb;27(2):145-8. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(98)00051-7.
The objective of this investigation is to test by common perception, the colour fidelity of laboratory-fired samples of ceramic. Thirty-two ceramic discs were constructed in a thickness similar to that used for ceramic veneers using eight shades from each of four different manufacturers. A group of 20 'adept' observers colour matched the samples in strictly controlled viewing conditions using a Vita Lumin (Vita Zahnfabrik) shade guide. Samples were categorised as 'positive matches'(matching the expected shade), 'agreed shades' (matching an unexpected shade), or as 'unidentified shades' (no match). The Vita Lumin (Vita Zahnfabrik) colour 'value' index was used as a reference to categorise colour 'value' differences between observed and expected shade. Colour 'value' selection was divided into three groups: (1) matching colour 'value', (2) shades of higher colour 'value' than expected or (3) shades of lower colour 'value' than expected. Only six of the 32 samples examined were perceived to be 'positive matches' with the recommended shade guide. Fourteen 'agreed shades' were found while the remaining 12 shades were regarded as 'unidentified shades'. The vast majority of observations disagreed with the manufacturers' designated shade. A significant trend was found favouring higher 'value' (lighter) shades than those specified by the manufactures. Significant differences in the pattern of shade matches and disagreements between brands were also found. Alternative shade determination systems and/or ceramic colour modifications are required if colour fidelity between the shade guide and the materials tested is to be improved.
本研究的目的是通过常识来测试实验室烧制的陶瓷样本的颜色保真度。使用四个不同制造商的每种八个色号,制作了32个厚度与陶瓷贴面所用厚度相似的陶瓷圆盘。一组20名“熟练”观察者在严格控制的观察条件下,使用Vita Lumin(维他齿科)比色板对样本进行颜色匹配。样本被分类为“正匹配”(与预期色号匹配)、“一致色号”(与意外色号匹配)或“未识别色号”(无匹配)。使用Vita Lumin(维他齿科)颜色“值”指数作为参考,对观察到的色号与预期色号之间的颜色“值”差异进行分类。颜色“值”选择分为三组:(1)匹配颜色“值”,(2)颜色“值”高于预期的色号,或(3)颜色“值”低于预期的色号。在检查的32个样本中,只有6个被认为与推荐的比色板“正匹配”。发现了14个“一致色号”,而其余12个色号被视为“未识别色号”。绝大多数观察结果与制造商指定的色号不一致。发现了一个显著趋势,即倾向于比制造商指定的色号更高“值”(更浅)的色号。还发现不同品牌在色号匹配和不一致模式上存在显著差异。如果要提高比色板与测试材料之间的颜色保真度,则需要替代的色号确定系统和/或陶瓷颜色修正。