Behr M, Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Schneider-Feyrer S, Handel G
Department of Prosthodontics, University of Regensburg, Germany.
J Dent. 1999 Feb;27(2):163-8. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(98)00036-0.
The aim of this study was to examine in-vitro whether adhesive fixed posterior inlay dentures (AFPID) made with the fibreglass-reinforced Vectris/Targis system (Ivoclar, Schaan, FL) have a fracture strength and a satisfactory marginal adaptation which can occur under clinical conditions. Extracted human third molars were embedded in a PMMA resin 10 mm apart to represent a molar gap. Two preparation methods were used: a box-shaped preparation technique (n = 8) and a tub-shaped preparation technique (n = 8). All AFPIDs were adhesively inserted using the dual curing composite cement, Variolink-high-viscosity (Vivadent, Schaan, FL). After thermocycling and mechanical loading (TCML: 6000 x 5 degrees C/55 degrees C, 1.2 Mio x 50 N, 1.66 Hz) in an artificial environment, the bridges were loaded to failure. Marginal adaption was investigated before and after TCML with the replica technique. After TCML, no significant difference was found in fracture strength between tub-shaped-preparation (median = 722 N, bending median = 0.9 mm) and box-shaped preparation (median = 696 N, bending median = 1.2 mm). A 'perfect margin' was observed in more than 60% of the investigated areas in both preparation techniques. With these values, the bridges can occur under clinical conditions and thus a clinical employment should be considered.
本研究的目的是在体外检查采用玻璃纤维增强的Vectris/Targis系统(义获嘉,沙恩,列支敦士登)制作的粘结固定式后牙嵌体义齿(AFPID)是否具有在临床条件下可能出现的断裂强度和令人满意的边缘适合性。将拔除的人类第三磨牙以10毫米的间距嵌入聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯树脂中以模拟磨牙间隙。使用了两种预备方法:盒状预备技术(n = 8)和桶状预备技术(n = 8)。所有AFPID均使用双固化复合树脂粘结剂Variolink-高粘度型(维他,沙恩,列支敦士登)粘结就位。在人工环境中进行热循环和机械加载(TCML:6000次5℃/55℃循环,120万次50 N加载,1.66 Hz)后,对桥体进行加载直至破坏。采用复制技术在TCML前后研究边缘适合性。TCML后,桶状预备(中位数 = 722 N,弯曲中位数 = 0.9 mm)和盒状预备(中位数 = 696 N,弯曲中位数 = 1.2 mm)之间的断裂强度未发现显著差异。在两种预备技术中,超过60%的研究区域观察到“完美边缘”。基于这些数值,该桥体在临床条件下可能出现,因此应考虑临床应用。