Cucchi A
Divisione di Urologia, Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Br J Urol. 1993 Nov;72(5 Pt 1):559-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1993.tb16209.x.
Twenty females with pure stress urinary incontinence (Group A) were studied clinically and urodynamically together with 20 stress incontinent women with idiopathic detrusor instability (Group B) and 20 controls (Group C). Forty females with the idiopathic urge syndrome, 20 with detrusor instability (motor urgency, Group D) and 20 with stable bladders (sensory urgency, Group E) were also investigated. Detrusor contractility, assessed on the basis of strength and velocity parameters derived from pressure flow data, was increased in the unstable groups. In particular, the maximum mechanical power (per unit of bladder wall surface area) generated by the contracting detrusor during voiding was higher in the unstable patients, this was also the case when estimating maximum bladder contraction velocity. No significant difference in these parameters was found in the patients with sensory urgency when compared with the controls and with the women with stress urinary incontinence, nor was there any significant difference between patients with motor urgency and the stress incontinent patients with detrusor instability. The enhanced contractile capability could be explained in the unstable stress incontinent group by a reduced threshold of stretch receptors in the urethral walls. If this were the case, urine running through the urethra at the beginning of voiding would be able to activate a urethrovesical reflex which may augment micturition contractions. In the group with the idiopathic urge syndrome one could speculate that sensory and motor urgency are due to the same neurological disorder (i.e. possibly a reduction in a tonic inhibitory or modulatory device) that would affect detrusor mechanics at different levels of the nervous system, resulting in different contractile capabilities.
对20名单纯性压力性尿失禁女性(A组)进行了临床和尿动力学研究,同时研究了20名伴有特发性逼尿肌不稳定的压力性尿失禁女性(B组)和20名对照者(C组)。还对40名患有特发性尿急综合征的女性进行了研究,其中20名患有逼尿肌不稳定(运动性尿急,D组),20名膀胱稳定(感觉性尿急,E组)。根据压力流数据得出的强度和速度参数评估,不稳定组的逼尿肌收缩力增加。特别是,不稳定患者排尿时收缩的逼尿肌产生的最大机械功率(每单位膀胱壁表面积)更高,在估计最大膀胱收缩速度时也是如此。与对照组和压力性尿失禁女性相比,感觉性尿急患者在这些参数上没有显著差异,运动性尿急患者与伴有逼尿肌不稳定的压力性尿失禁患者之间也没有显著差异。在不稳定的压力性尿失禁组中,收缩能力增强可以用尿道壁牵张感受器阈值降低来解释。如果是这样,排尿开始时流经尿道的尿液将能够激活尿道膀胱反射,这可能会增强排尿收缩。在特发性尿急综合征组中,可以推测感觉性和运动性尿急是由于相同的神经功能障碍(即可能是一种紧张性抑制或调节装置的减少),这会在神经系统的不同水平影响逼尿肌力学,导致不同的收缩能力。