Suppr超能文献

奥克兰的分枝杆菌性颈淋巴结炎:通过细针穿刺抽吸进行诊断

Mycobacterial cervical adenitis in Auckland: diagnosis by fine needle aspirate.

作者信息

Harrison A C, Jayasundera T

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Services, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 1999 Jan 22;112(1080):7-9.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the role of fine needle aspiration (FNA) in the diagnosis of tuberculous and non-tuberculous mycobacterial cervical adenitis in Auckland, and to examine the demography of these conditions.

METHOD

We reviewed the medical records of cases of mycobacterial adenitis in the Auckland region between 1991-1994. Cases were identified by cross-checking the reference mycobacteriology laboratory records, all hospital cytology reports from cases who had an FNA taken from the neck region and hospital discharge diagnosis databases.

RESULTS

Twenty-two cases of M tuberculosis adenitis, and 13 of M avium adenitis were identified. No FNAs were smear positive for mycobacteria. The FNA from 6/18 (33%) cases of M tuberculosis adenitis and from 4/6 (66%) M avium adenitis cases were culture positive. Bacteriological confirmation was obtained (by various methods) in 72% of tuberculous and in 100% of M avium adenitis cases. The clinical picture was different for the two organisms: tuberculous adenitis occurred mainly in caucasian adults, while M avium adenitis cases were predominantly caucasian children. None of the confirmed cases of tuberculous adenitis demonstrated drug resistance to standard anti-tuberculous agents.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Clinicians should more consistently include mycobacterial tests when investigating neck lumps. (2) FNA is not a reliable diagnostic test for mycobacterial cervical adenitis in New Zealand. Here, FNA should only be regarded as a screening test for mycobacterial adenitis. If anti-tuberculous treatment is required before it is known whether FNA has provided a positive culture, excision biopsy should first be performed to identify the mycobacterium and its susceptibility pattern.

摘要

目的

评估细针穿刺抽吸术(FNA)在奥克兰地区结核性和非结核性分枝杆菌性颈淋巴结炎诊断中的作用,并研究这些疾病的人口统计学特征。

方法

我们回顾了1991年至1994年间奥克兰地区分枝杆菌性淋巴结炎病例的医疗记录。通过交叉核对参考分枝杆菌学实验室记录、所有来自颈部区域进行FNA的病例的医院细胞学报告以及医院出院诊断数据库来确定病例。

结果

确诊22例结核分枝杆菌性淋巴结炎病例和13例鸟分枝杆菌性淋巴结炎病例。FNA涂片均未发现分枝杆菌阳性。18例结核分枝杆菌性淋巴结炎病例中有6例(33%)的FNA培养呈阳性,6例鸟分枝杆菌性淋巴结炎病例中有4例(66%)的FNA培养呈阳性。72%的结核性病例和100%的鸟分枝杆菌性淋巴结炎病例通过各种方法获得了细菌学确诊。两种病原体的临床表现不同:结核性淋巴结炎主要发生在白种成年人中,而鸟分枝杆菌性淋巴结炎病例主要是白种儿童。确诊的结核性淋巴结炎病例均未显示对标准抗结核药物耐药。

结论

(1)临床医生在检查颈部肿块时应更一致地进行分枝杆菌检测。(2)在新西兰,FNA并非结核分枝杆菌性颈淋巴结炎的可靠诊断方法。在此,FNA仅应被视为分枝杆菌性淋巴结炎的筛查试验。如果在FNA培养结果未知之前就需要进行抗结核治疗,应首先进行切除活检以鉴定分枝杆菌及其药敏模式。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验