Kato T, Kimura Y, Sawabe M, Masuda Y, Kitamura K
Department of Otolaryngology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
J Laryngol Otol. 2009 Dec;123(12):1343-7. doi: 10.1017/S0022215109990880.
Patients suspected of having cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis are diagnosed using investigations such as fine needle aspiration cytology and the polymerase chain reaction for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. However, these investigations are intended for primary tuberculosis infection. The majority of cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis cases in the elderly are thought to be caused by reactivation.
The aims of this study were (1) to examine the efficacy of fine needle aspiration cytology, polymerase chain reaction and blood tests in the diagnosis of cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis caused by reactivation, and (2) to clarify any differences when compared with primarily infected cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis cases.
Thirty-three elderly patients with neck lumps underwent excisional biopsy from 2003 to 2008. The efficacy of fine needle aspiration cytology was examined by comparing the results of excisional biopsy with those of fine needle aspiration cytology performed at the initial medical examination for cases of suspected tuberculous disease. Furthermore, the leucocyte count and C-reactive protein concentration were compared for cases of cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis versus cases of malignant lymphoma.
Although nine cases were diagnosed with cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis using excisional biopsy, only one of these had been suspected based on fine needle aspiration cytology results. Three cases with tuberculous lymphadenitis were suspected of having malignant lymphoma on initial examination. There was no significant difference in the leucocyte count and C-reactive protein concentration, comparing cases of tuberculous lymphadenitis versus malignant lymphoma.
Unlike the primary infection often seen in endemic areas, the diagnosis of early stage tuberculous lymphadenitis of the swelling type caused by reactivation in elderly people is difficult to confirm unless excisional biopsy is performed. In elderly patients with neck lumps, cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis should be included in the differential diagnosis.
疑似患有颈部结核性淋巴结炎的患者通过细针穿刺细胞学检查和结核分枝杆菌聚合酶链反应等检查进行诊断。然而,这些检查适用于原发性结核感染。老年人颈部结核性淋巴结炎的大多数病例被认为是由复发引起的。
本研究的目的是(1)检查细针穿刺细胞学检查、聚合酶链反应和血液检查在诊断由复发引起的颈部结核性淋巴结炎中的疗效,以及(2)阐明与原发性感染的颈部结核性淋巴结炎病例相比的任何差异。
2003年至2008年,33例颈部肿块的老年患者接受了切除活检。通过将切除活检结果与疑似结核病病例初次体检时进行的细针穿刺细胞学检查结果进行比较,检查细针穿刺细胞学检查的疗效。此外,比较了颈部结核性淋巴结炎病例与恶性淋巴瘤病例的白细胞计数和C反应蛋白浓度。
尽管通过切除活检诊断出9例颈部结核性淋巴结炎,但根据细针穿刺细胞学检查结果仅怀疑其中1例。3例结核性淋巴结炎病例在初次检查时被怀疑患有恶性淋巴瘤。比较结核性淋巴结炎病例与恶性淋巴瘤病例,白细胞计数和C反应蛋白浓度没有显著差异。
与流行地区常见的原发性感染不同,除非进行切除活检,否则很难确诊老年人由复发引起的肿胀型早期结核性淋巴结炎。对于有颈部肿块的老年患者,应将颈部结核性淋巴结炎纳入鉴别诊断。