Awad A G, Voruganti L P
Clarke Institute of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60 Suppl 3:22-6; discussion 27-8.
Estimation of quality of life is important to the study of the pharmacoeconomics of schizophrenia. The subject has gained popularity among policymakers, clinicians, and patients and their families, since the advent of new antipsychotic medications that are more expensive than older drugs yet have been shown to cause fewer side effects. Quantifying quality of life has been difficult, since studies often inconsistently define the concept or use rating scales that are inappropriate for the patient population. Utility analysis is a procedure that calculates subjects' preferences regarding living with various health states, given such options as trading more years of life at a lowered health state for dying sooner but having a strong health state during the last years of life. The feasibility of performing utility analysis among patients with schizophrenia was recently examined in a study carried out by the authors. This article reflects initial observations from that study of utility analysis and includes a discussion of problems still facing the study of quality of life and utility analysis.
生活质量评估对于精神分裂症药物经济学研究至关重要。自从新型抗精神病药物问世以来,该主题在政策制定者、临床医生以及患者及其家属中受到了广泛关注。新型抗精神病药物比旧药更昂贵,但已证明副作用更少。量化生活质量一直很困难,因为研究常常对这一概念的定义不一致,或者使用的评分量表不适用于患者群体。效用分析是一种程序,它计算受试者在面对各种健康状态时的偏好,例如以较低的健康状态换取更多的生存年限,还是宁愿早死但在生命的最后几年拥有良好的健康状态。作者最近进行的一项研究探讨了在精神分裂症患者中进行效用分析的可行性。本文反映了该效用分析研究的初步观察结果,并讨论了生活质量研究和效用分析仍面临的问题。