Smith D H, Ward P, Linden R M
Institute of Gene Therapy and Molecular Medicine, Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, USA.
J Virol. 1999 Apr;73(4):2930-7. doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.4.2930-2937.1999.
Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) are nonautonomous human parvoviruses in that they are dependent on helper functions supplied by other viruses or on genotoxic stimuli for conditions permissive for replication. In the absence of helper, AAV type 2 enters latency by integration into a specific site on human chromosome 19. This feature of AAV, in combination with a lack of pathogenicity, makes AAV an attractive candidate vector for human gene therapy. Goose parvovirus (GPV) is both autonomous and pathogenic yet is highly homologous to AAV. To address the molecular bases for the different viral lifestyles, we compare the AAV and GPV nonstructural proteins, Rep78 and Rep1, respectively. We find that Rep78 and Rep1 possess several biochemical activities in common, including (i) high-affinity DNA binding for sequences that constitute the minimal DNA replication origin; (ii) nucleoside triphosphate-dependent DNA helicase activity; and (iii) origin-specific replication of double-stranded linear DNA. These experiments also establish a specific 38-bp DNA sequence as the minimal GPV DNA replication origin. It is noteworthy that although the proposed Rep binding sites of GPV and AAV are highly similar, Rep1 and Rep78 show a high degree of specificity for their respective origins, in both binding and replication assays. One significant difference was observed; with the minimal replication origin in adenovirus-uninfected extracts, Rep78-mediated replication exhibited low processivity, as previously reported. In contrast, Rep1 efficiently replicated full-length template. Overall, our studies indicate that GPV Rep1 and AAV Rep78 support a comparable mode of replication. Thus, a comparison of the two proteins provides a model system with which to determine the contribution of Rep in the regulation of dependence and autonomy at the level of DNA replication.
腺相关病毒(AAV)是非自主型人类细小病毒,因为它们依赖于其他病毒提供的辅助功能或基因毒性刺激来创造允许复制的条件。在没有辅助病毒的情况下,2型腺相关病毒通过整合到人19号染色体上的特定位点进入潜伏期。腺相关病毒的这一特性,再加上其无致病性,使其成为人类基因治疗中极具吸引力的候选载体。鹅细小病毒(GPV)既是自主型的又是致病性的,但与腺相关病毒高度同源。为了探究这两种病毒不同生活方式的分子基础,我们分别比较了腺相关病毒和鹅细小病毒的非结构蛋白Rep78和Rep1。我们发现Rep78和Rep1具有几种共同的生化活性,包括:(i)对构成最小DNA复制起点的序列具有高亲和力的DNA结合能力;(ii)核苷三磷酸依赖性DNA解旋酶活性;以及(iii)双链线性DNA的起点特异性复制。这些实验还确定了一个特定的38bp DNA序列作为最小的鹅细小病毒DNA复制起点。值得注意的是,尽管鹅细小病毒和腺相关病毒假定的Rep结合位点高度相似,但在结合和复制实验中,Rep1和Rep78对各自的起点都表现出高度特异性。观察到一个显著差异;如先前报道的那样,在未感染腺病毒的提取物中,以最小复制起点进行时,Rep78介导的复制表现出低持续性。相比之下,Rep1能有效复制全长模板。总体而言,我们的研究表明鹅细小病毒Rep1和腺相关病毒Rep78支持类似的复制模式。因此,对这两种蛋白质的比较提供了一个模型系统,可用于确定Rep在DNA复制水平上对依赖性和自主性调控的贡献。