Suppr超能文献

内皮素A和B受体亚型与Gi、Go和Gq在重构磷脂囊泡中的相互作用。

Interactions of endothelin receptor subtypes A and B with Gi, Go, and Gq in reconstituted phospholipid vesicles.

作者信息

Doi T, Sugimoto H, Arimoto I, Hiroaki Y, Fujiyoshi Y

机构信息

International Institute for Advanced Research, Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Biochemistry. 1999 Mar 9;38(10):3090-9. doi: 10.1021/bi981919m.

Abstract

To understand the biochemical basis for the functional divergence of the human endothelin receptor subtypes A (ETAR) and B (ETBR), they were expressed, purified from insect Sf9 cells, and reconstituted into phospholipid vesicles with the Go, Gq, and Gi proteins. For each G protein, a unique pattern of reactivity was observed with the different receptor subtypes. Both ETAR and ETBR activated Go to a similar maximal extent, and both subtypes activated Gq with similar EC50 values; however, the ETAR displayed a 2-3-fold higher maximal extent of activation. In contrast, both subtypes activated Gi to a similar maximal extent, but the ETAR displayed a 4-fold higher EC50 value as compared to the ETBR. To test whether these coupling specificities are influenced by C-terminal palmitoylation of the receptor, we mutated a cluster of cysteine residues near the end of the seventh transmembrane helix in both receptors. While the cysteine mutations in the ETBR resulted in a partially palmitoylated receptor, the replacement of these cysteine residues in the ETAR yielded a mostly palmitoyl-deficient receptor and had no effect on Go activation, but caused a reduction in the extents of Gi and Gq stimulation. Together, these studies provide important insights into the specificity of G protein coupling in the endothelin receptors. The ability to discriminate between the different G proteins under various physiological conditions may be a key element in the selection of distinct signal transduction pathways by the two receptor subtypes.

摘要

为了解人类内皮素受体A亚型(ETAR)和B亚型(ETBR)功能差异的生化基础,将它们在昆虫Sf9细胞中表达、纯化,然后与Go、Gq和Gi蛋白一起重构到磷脂囊泡中。对于每种G蛋白,观察到不同受体亚型具有独特的反应模式。ETAR和ETBR激活Go的最大程度相似,两种亚型激活Gq的EC50值相似;然而,ETAR的最大激活程度高2至3倍。相比之下,两种亚型激活Gi的最大程度相似,但与ETBR相比,ETAR的EC50值高4倍。为了测试这些偶联特异性是否受受体C末端棕榈酰化的影响,我们对两种受体中第七个跨膜螺旋末端附近的一簇半胱氨酸残基进行了突变。虽然ETBR中的半胱氨酸突变导致受体部分棕榈酰化,但ETAR中这些半胱氨酸残基的替换产生了一个几乎缺乏棕榈酰化的受体,对Go激活没有影响,但导致Gi和Gq刺激程度降低。总之,这些研究为内皮素受体中G蛋白偶联的特异性提供了重要见解。在各种生理条件下区分不同G蛋白的能力可能是两种受体亚型选择不同信号转导途径的关键因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验