Newton C W, Mulnix N, Baer L, Bovee T
Blodgett Memorial Medical Center, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49506, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Mar;93(3):350-2. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00419-0.
To determine if buffered lidocaine provided a more effective nerve block in a short time than plain lidocaine for neonatal circumcision.
One hundred ninety-four newborn males were studied in a randomized trial using two dorsal penile nerve block preparations for circumcision. Ninety-two received plain lidocaine, and 102 received buffered lidocaine. The infants were evaluated at timed intervals before the procedure, during anesthetic injection, and during circumcision. Objective measurements of heart rate and oxygen saturation, and subjective determinations of behavioral state were recorded. Using heart rate as the major outcome variable, it was determined that 65 subjects per group would be needed to achieve a power of .08. Complications also were noted.
Heart rates and oxygen saturations were similar in the two groups at each timed interval. The behavioral characteristics and amount of crying also were comparable in both groups. The only complication was minor bleeding, seen in each group.
Adding a buffering agent to lidocaine did not provide a more effective level of anesthesia in a short time.
确定在新生儿包皮环切术中,与普通利多卡因相比,缓冲利多卡因是否能在短时间内提供更有效的神经阻滞。
在一项随机试验中,对194例新生男婴进行研究,采用两种用于包皮环切术的阴茎背神经阻滞制剂。92例接受普通利多卡因,102例接受缓冲利多卡因。在手术前、麻醉注射期间和包皮环切术期间按时间间隔对婴儿进行评估。记录心率和血氧饱和度的客观测量值以及行为状态的主观判定结果。以心率作为主要结局变量,确定每组需要65名受试者才能达到0.08的检验效能。同时记录并发症情况。
在每个时间间隔,两组的心率和血氧饱和度相似。两组的行为特征和哭闹程度也相当。唯一的并发症是轻微出血,两组均有出现。
在利多卡因中添加缓冲剂并不能在短时间内提供更有效的麻醉效果。