Malone N, Rycroft-Malone J
Oxford Brookes University, UK.
J Nurs Manag. 1998 Nov;6(6):325-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2834.1998.00086.x.
This paper explores the historical and political basis of equity and rationing in the British National Health Service (NHS).
Rationing has always featured in the NHS as an implicit, rather than explicit process. Recent healthcare reforms have highlighted the inequity of healthcare provision in the UK and made the rationing debate more explicit.
Information is drawn from a variety of sources which include research studies, review articles and books, policy documents and personal experience of working in the NHS.
The search for efficiency in the new NHS is in conflict with the principle of equity and the most vulnerable groups in society are being denied access to healthcare. Decisions about rationing are currently made at a local rather than a national level resulting in variability of health service provision, an inconsistency which will continue with the development of primary care groups.
Rationing of healthcare resources is thought to be inevitable as demands for healthcare increase in a funds-limited service. Rationing of resources is a political problem that requires some form of guidance from central government.
本文探讨英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中公平与资源分配的历史和政治基础。
资源分配在NHS中一直是一个隐性而非显性的过程。近期的医疗改革凸显了英国医疗服务提供的不公平性,并使资源分配的辩论更加明确。
信息来自多种渠道,包括研究、综述文章和书籍、政策文件以及在NHS工作的个人经验。
新的NHS追求效率与公平原则相冲突,社会中最弱势群体无法获得医疗服务。目前关于资源分配的决策是在地方而非国家层面做出的,这导致医疗服务提供的差异,随着初级保健团体的发展,这种不一致性仍将持续。
随着资金有限的服务中医疗需求的增加,医疗资源的分配被认为是不可避免的。资源分配是一个政治问题,需要中央政府提供某种形式的指导。