Suppr超能文献

英国国家医疗服务体系中的配给议程。配给议程小组。

The rationing agenda in the NHS. Rationing Agenda Group.

作者信息

New B

机构信息

King's Fund Policy Institute, London.

出版信息

BMJ. 1996 Jun 22;312(7046):1593-601. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1593.

Abstract

The Rationing Agenda Group has been founded to deepen the British debate on rationing health care. It believes that rationing in health care is inevitable and that the public must be involved in the debate about issues relating to rationing. The group comprises people from all parts of health care, none of whom represent either their group or their institutions. RAG has begun by producing this document, which attempts to set an agenda of all the issues that need to be considered when debating the rationing of health care. We hope for responses to the document. The next stage will be to incorporate the responses into the agenda. Then RAG will divide the agenda into manageable chunks and commission expert, detailed commentaries. From this material a final paper will be published and used to prompt public debate. This stage should be reached early in 1997. While these papers are being prepared RAG is developing ways to involve the public in the debate and evaluate the whole process. We present as neutrally as possible all the issues related to rationing and priority setting in the NHS. We focus on the NHS for two reasons. Firstly, for those of us resident in the United Kingdom the NHS is the health care system with which we are most familiar and most concerned. Secondly, focusing on one system alone allows more coherent analysis than would be possible if issues in other systems were included as well. Our concern is with the delivery of health care, not its finance, though we discuss the possible effects of changing the financing system of the NHS. Finally, though our position is neutral, we hold two substantive views--namely, that rationing is unavoidable and that there should be more explicit debate about the principles and issues concerned. We consider the issues under four headings: preliminaries, ethics, democracy, and empirical questions. Preliminaries deal with the semantics of rationing, whether rationing is necessary, and with the range of services to which rationing relates. Under ethics and democracy are the substantive issues of principle and theory. The final section deals with empirical questions and those relating to the practicality of various strategies.

摘要

配给议程小组的成立旨在深化英国关于医疗保健配给的辩论。该小组认为,医疗保健配给不可避免,公众必须参与有关配给相关问题的辩论。小组成员来自医疗保健领域的各个方面,他们均不代表其所在的团体或机构。配给议程小组首先撰写了这份文件,试图列出在辩论医疗保健配给时所有需要考虑的问题的议程。我们希望收到对该文件的反馈。下一阶段将把反馈意见纳入议程。然后,配给议程小组将把议程分成便于处理的部分,并委托专家撰写详细的评论。根据这些材料将发表一篇最终论文,并用于引发公众辩论。这个阶段应在1997年初实现。在准备这些文件的同时,配给议程小组正在探索让公众参与辩论并评估整个过程的方法。我们尽可能中立地呈现与国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中的配给和优先事项设定相关的所有问题。我们关注国民医疗服务体系有两个原因。其一,对于我们这些居住在英国的人来说,国民医疗服务体系是我们最熟悉、最关心的医疗保健系统。其二,仅关注一个系统比将其他系统的问题也包括进来能进行更连贯的分析。我们关注的是医疗保健的提供,而非其资金问题,不过我们也讨论了改变国民医疗服务体系融资系统可能产生的影响。最后,尽管我们的立场是中立的,但我们持有两个实质性观点,即配给是不可避免的,并且应该就相关原则和问题进行更明确的辩论。我们从四个标题下考虑这些问题:引言、伦理、民主和实证问题。引言部分涉及配给的语义、配给是否必要以及配给所涉及的服务范围。伦理和民主部分涵盖原则和理论的实质性问题。最后一部分处理实证问题以及与各种策略实用性相关的问题。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
The NHS at 60: the next 60 years.英国国家医疗服务体系60年:未来60年
J R Soc Med. 2008 Jul;101(7):345-9. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2008.nh8006.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验