Shirtliff M E, Mader J T, Calhoun J
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-1019, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Feb(359):229-36. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199902000-00026.
A rabbit model for Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis was used to compare 28-day combination antibiotic therapy using oral rifampin (40 mg/kg, twice daily) plus oral azithromycin (50 mg/kg, once per day), oral clarithromycin (80 mg/kg, twice daily), or parenteral nafcillin (30 mg/kg, four times daily). The left tibial metaphysis of New Zealand White rabbits was infected with Staphylococcus aureus. Grades 3 to 4 osteomyelitis (according to the Cierny-Mader classification system) development in the rabbits was confirmed radiographically. After antibiotic therapy regimens of 28 days, all tibias from controls that were infected but left untreated (n = 10) revealed positive cultures for Staphylococcus aureus at a mean concentration of 2.8 x 10(4) colony forming units/g bone. The rifampin plus clarithromycin (n = 15) and rifampin plus azithromycin (n = 15) groups showed significantly lower percentages of positive Staphylococcus aureus infection (20% and 13.3%, respectively) and bacterial concentrations (3.5 x 10(1) and 1.75 x 10(1) colony forming units/g bone, respectively). The osteomyelitic tibias of the nafcillin plus rifampin treated group (n = 7) showed no detectable Staphylococcus aureus infection (significantly lower than controls). The differences observed for bone bacterial concentrations and sterilization percentages between the antibiotic treated groups were not statistically significant. Although fluoroquinolones (including ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin) are the agents usually prescribed with rifampin, increasing resistance has been observed. Although macrolides traditionally are not used in the treatment of osteomyelitis, the results of this study indicate that azithromycin and clarithromycin may be attractive partners for rifampin for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in humans.
采用金黄色葡萄球菌骨髓炎兔模型,比较28天联合抗生素治疗方案,即口服利福平(40毫克/千克,每日两次)加口服阿奇霉素(50毫克/千克,每日一次)、口服克拉霉素(80毫克/千克,每日两次)或胃肠外注射萘夫西林(30毫克/千克,每日四次)。将新西兰白兔的左胫骨近端干骺端感染金黄色葡萄球菌。通过X线检查确认兔发生3至4级骨髓炎(根据Cierny-Mader分类系统)。在28天的抗生素治疗方案后,所有感染但未治疗的对照兔胫骨(n = 10)金黄色葡萄球菌培养均为阳性,平均浓度为2.8×10⁴菌落形成单位/克骨。利福平加克拉霉素组(n = 15)和利福平加阿奇霉素组(n = 15)金黄色葡萄球菌感染阳性率(分别为20%和13.3%)和细菌浓度(分别为3.5×10¹和1.75×10¹菌落形成单位/克骨)显著较低。萘夫西林加利福平治疗组的骨髓炎胫骨(n = 7)未检测到金黄色葡萄球菌感染(显著低于对照组)。抗生素治疗组之间观察到的骨细菌浓度和杀菌率差异无统计学意义。虽然氟喹诺酮类药物(包括氧氟沙星和环丙沙星)通常与利福平联合使用,但已观察到耐药性增加。虽然大环内酯类药物传统上不用于治疗骨髓炎,但本研究结果表明,阿奇霉素和克拉霉素可能是利福平治疗人类金黄色葡萄球菌骨髓炎的有吸引力的联合用药。