A cost comparison of infertility treatment for clomiphene resistant polycystic ovary syndrome.

BACKGROUND

The study compares treatment outcome and costs of ovulation induction cycles and in vitro fertilization cycles in infertile women with clomiphene resistant polycystic ovary syndrome.

METHODS

Twenty-eight infertile women with clomiphene resistant polycystic ovary syndrome referred to a university clinic were prospectively randomized to ovulation induction or in vitro fertilization. Forty-one ovulation induction cycles and thirty in vitro fertilization cycles were performed. Mann-Whitney U-test was used for between group comparisons and frequencies were compared with Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

More pregnancies per completed cycle were noted in the in vitro fertilization group than in the ovulation induction group. Drug costs were not much higher in the in vitro fertilization group but treatment costs were higher due to the additional costs of ovum pick up and embryo transfer. The cost per pregnancy was about twice as high in the ovulation induction group as in the in vitro fertilization group. The cost per term pregnancy including delivery was 1.6 times higher in the ovulation induction group.

CONCLUSION

For a group of obese women with clomiphene resistant polycystic ovary syndrome, in vitro fertilization seems a cost-effective treatment.