• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

决策团队中领导者利用员工意见的前因。

Antecedents of Leader Utilization of Staff Input in Decision-Making Teams.

作者信息

Phillips JM

机构信息

Department of Human Resource Management, Rutgers University

出版信息

Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Mar;77(3):215-242. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2819.

DOI:10.1006/obhd.1998.2819
PMID:10080914
Abstract

The purpose of this experiment was to explore the possibility that the inconsistent findings of Brehmer and Hagafors (1986, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 181-195), Sniezek and Buckley (1995, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 159-174), and leader-member exchange research regarding leaders' propensity to differentially and accurately weight staff input can be explained as a result of experience, the availability to the leader of staff member judgment confidence, and the cumulative past accuracy of each staff member. The availability to the team leader of staff member past judgment accuracy and staff member judgment confidence was provided in an environment in which differential staff weighting was the appropriate staff utilization strategy. Eighty-four leaders of four-person decision-making teams performed 63 decisions on a computerized decision-making task. Both experience and providing leaders with cumulative staff past accuracy information were related to greater staff weighting variability and greater staff weighting accuracy. Although positively related to staff weighting, staff confidence information did not improve leader weighting variability nor actual staff weighting accuracy. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

摘要

本实验的目的是探究以下可能性

布雷默和哈加福斯(1986年,《组织行为与人类决策过程》,第38卷,第181 - 195页)、斯涅泽克和巴克利(1995年,《组织行为与人类决策过程》,第62卷,第159 - 174页)以及领导 - 成员交换研究中关于领导者对员工意见进行差异化和准确加权倾向的不一致结果,是否可以解释为经验、领导者获取员工判断信心的情况以及每个员工过去累积的准确性的结果。在差异化员工加权是合适的员工利用策略的环境中,向团队领导者提供了员工过去判断准确性和员工判断信心的信息。84名四人决策团队的领导者在一项计算机化决策任务中做出了63个决策。经验以及向领导者提供员工过去累积的准确性信息都与更大的员工加权变异性和更高的员工加权准确性相关。虽然员工信心信息与员工加权呈正相关,但它既没有提高领导者加权的变异性,也没有提高实际的员工加权准确性。版权所有1999年学术出版社。

相似文献

1
Antecedents of Leader Utilization of Staff Input in Decision-Making Teams.决策团队中领导者利用员工意见的前因。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Mar;77(3):215-242. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2819.
2
The role of decision influence and team performance in member self-efficacy, withdrawal, satisfaction with the leader, and willingness to return.决策影响力和团队绩效在成员自我效能感、退出、对领导者的满意度以及回归意愿方面的作用。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2001 Jan;84(1):122-47. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2922.
3
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
4
Innovation in globally distributed teams: the role of LMX, communication frequency, and member influence on team decisions.全球分布式团队中的创新:LMX、沟通频率以及成员影响力对团队决策的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Nov;97(6):1252-61. doi: 10.1037/a0028958. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
5
Productivity and turnover in PCPs: the role of staff participation in decision-making.
Med Care. 2006 Oct;44(10):946-51. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000220828.43049.32.
6
Do you see what we see? The complex effects of perceptual distance between leaders and teams.你看到我们所看到的了吗?领导者与团队之间感知距离的复杂影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jan;94(1):62-76. doi: 10.1037/a0013073.
7
Do heart failure specialist nurses think differently when faced with 'hard' or 'easy' decisions: a judgement analysis.心力衰竭专科护士在面对“艰难”或“容易”的决策时思维方式是否不同:一项判断分析。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Aug;17(16):2174-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02303.x.
8
Innovation credit: when can leaders oppose their group's norms?创新信誉:领导者何时会反对其群体规范?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Sep;95(3):662-78. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.662.
9
Contingent Weighting in Self-Other Decision Making.自我与他人决策中的权变加权
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2000 Sep;83(1):82-106. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2903.
10
The impact of previous leaders on the evaluation of new leaders: an alternative to prototype matching.前任领导者对新领导者评价的影响:原型匹配的一种替代方式。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Nov;92(6):1683-95. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1683.

引用本文的文献

1
Receptiveness to advice, cognitive ability, and technology adoption.对建议的接受度、认知能力和技术采用情况。
J Econ Behav Organ. 2018 May;149:239-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2017.12.025. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
2
Do physicians' recommendations pull patients away from their preferred treatment options?医生的建议会使患者远离他们首选的治疗方案吗?
Health Expect. 2012 Mar;15(1):23-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00658.x. Epub 2011 Feb 16.