• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术与¹²⁵碘近距离放射治疗局限性前列腺癌的回顾性比较

Retrospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and 125iodine brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.

作者信息

Ramos C G, Carvalhal G F, Smith D S, Mager D E, Catalona W J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 1999 Apr;161(4):1212-5.

PMID:10081871
Abstract

PURPOSE

Favorable results with 125iodine (I) brachytherapy have been reported in select patients with localized prostate cancer. We evaluate the results of radical prostatectomy in patients matched for similar pretreatment clinicopathological characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From May 1983 to April 1998, 1 surgeon (W. J. C.) performed radical retropubic prostatectomy in 1,952 men (mean age plus or minus standard deviation 63+/-7 years), of whom 1,364 had Gleason score 6 or less on preoperative needle biopsy, a preoperative serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) value available and clinical stage T1 or T2 disease. We categorized all patients by preoperative Gleason score, preoperative PSA and clinical stage. For each Gleason score-by-PSA stratum we randomly selected by computer the number of men necessary to achieve the same overall distribution of clinical characteristics as in a series of patients treated with brachytherapy. All men were followed with semiannual PSA measurements and annual digital rectal examinations. Serum PSA greater than 0.3 ng/ml was considered evidence of cancer recurrence. Simple univariate statistics were used to compare clinical characteristics between series, and 7-year recurrence-free survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates. To avoid a possible chance extreme result from 1 random sample we estimated 7-year recurrence-free survival in 5 computer selected random samples of our population.

RESULTS

Mean 7-year recurrence-free survival was 84% (95% confidence intervals 78 to 89) for the radical prostatectomy series compared to 79% (confidence intervals not provided) for the 125I brachytherapy series.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical prostatectomy yielded a proportionately but not statistically significant higher 7-year probability of nonprogression than 125I brachytherapy in patients with favorable clinicopathological characteristics. Comparisons are confounded by residual differences in clinicopathological features of tumors between groups and different treatment end points to determine outcomes. Further prospective, randomized clinical trials are required for valid comparisons.

摘要

目的

有报道称,125碘(I)近距离放射治疗对部分局限性前列腺癌患者取得了良好效果。我们评估了具有相似治疗前临床病理特征的患者行根治性前列腺切除术的结果。

材料与方法

1983年5月至1998年4月,1名外科医生(W.J.C.)对1952名男性患者(平均年龄±标准差63±7岁)实施了耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术,其中1364例患者术前穿刺活检Gleason评分≤6分,有术前血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)值且临床分期为T1或T2期疾病。我们根据术前Gleason评分、术前PSA和临床分期对所有患者进行分类。对于每个Gleason评分-PSA分层,我们通过计算机随机选择必要数量的男性,以使其临床特征的总体分布与一系列接受近距离放射治疗的患者相同。所有男性均接受半年一次的PSA检测和每年一次的直肠指检。血清PSA大于0.3 ng/ml被视为癌症复发的证据。采用简单单变量统计方法比较各系列之间的临床特征,并使用Kaplan-Meier乘积限估计法估计7年无复发生存率。为避免1个随机样本可能出现的极端结果,我们在计算机选择的5个随机样本中估计了总体人群的7年无复发生存率。

结果

根治性前列腺切除术系列的平均7年无复发生存率为84%(95%置信区间78至89),而125I近距离放射治疗系列为79%(未提供置信区间)。

结论

在具有良好临床病理特征的患者中,根治性前列腺切除术的7年无进展概率比125I近距离放射治疗略高,但无统计学意义。由于两组肿瘤临床病理特征的残留差异以及用于确定结局的不同治疗终点,比较结果受到混淆。需要进一步开展前瞻性随机临床试验以进行有效比较。

相似文献

1
Retrospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and 125iodine brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术与¹²⁵碘近距离放射治疗局限性前列腺癌的回顾性比较
J Urol. 1999 Apr;161(4):1212-5.
2
Clinical and pathological characteristics, and recurrence rates of stage T1c versus T2a or T2b prostate cancer.T1c期与T2a期或T2b期前列腺癌的临床和病理特征及复发率
J Urol. 1999 May;161(5):1525-9.
3
Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.临床局限性前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后的生化(前列腺特异性抗原)复发概率。
J Urol. 2003 Feb;169(2):517-23. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000045749.90353.c7.
4
Comparison of radical prostatectomy and iodine 125 interstitial radiotherapy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer: a 7-year biochemical (PSA) progression analysis.
Urology. 1998 Jun;51(6):884-9; discussion 889-90.
5
Percent of cores positive for cancer is a better preoperative predictor of cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen.癌症阳性核心的百分比在预测前列腺癌根治术后癌症复发方面比前列腺特异性抗原是更好的术前预测指标。
J Urol. 2004 Apr;171(4):1492-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000118690.05943.c0.
6
Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.使用基于前列腺特异性抗原密度和活检Gleason评分的新型风险分组系统改善根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的风险分层。
J Urol. 2002 Jul;168(1):110-5.
7
Is preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen level significantly related to clinical recurrence after radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer?对于局限性前列腺癌,耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后,术前血清前列腺特异性抗原水平与临床复发是否显著相关?
BJU Int. 2006 Jan;97(1):51-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05886.x.
8
Long-term hazard of progression after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: continued risk of biochemical failure after 5 years.临床局限性前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后进展的长期风险:5年后仍有生化复发的持续风险。
J Urol. 2000 Jul;164(1):101-5.
9
The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.前列腺穿刺活检标本中癌阳性核心的百分比强烈预测根治性前列腺切除术中的肿瘤分期和体积。
J Urol. 2000 Jan;163(1):174-8.
10
Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results.3478例连续性患者接受耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后的癌症进展和生存率:长期结果
J Urol. 2004 Sep;172(3):910-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000134888.22332.bb.

引用本文的文献

1
Radical prostatectomy versus brachytherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer on oncological and functional outcomes: a meta-analysis.根治性前列腺切除术与近距离放射治疗对临床局限性前列腺癌的肿瘤学和功能结局影响的荟萃分析
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Apr;9(2):332-343. doi: 10.21037/tau.2020.02.15.
2
Meta-analysis of studies comparing oncologic outcomes of radical prostatectomy and brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.比较根治性前列腺切除术和近距离放射治疗局限性前列腺癌肿瘤学结局的研究的荟萃分析。
Ther Adv Urol. 2017 Oct 9;9(11):241-250. doi: 10.1177/1756287217731449. eCollection 2017 Nov.
3
Low-dose rate brachytherapy of the prostate in elderly patients.
前列腺低剂量率近距离治疗老年患者。
Radiol Med. 2013 Dec;118(8):1412-21. doi: 10.1007/s11547-012-0872-0. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
4
Secondary effects and biochemical control in patients with early prostate cancer treated with (125)-I seeds.
Clin Transl Oncol. 2008 Jun;10(6):359-66. doi: 10.1007/s12094-008-0212-y.
5
Permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer: a current review.前列腺癌永久性组织间近距离放射治疗:当前综述
World J Urol. 2003 Sep;21(4):209-19. doi: 10.1007/s00345-003-0357-9. Epub 2003 Aug 13.
6
Stability of time trade-off utilities for health states associated with the treatment of prostate cancer.与前列腺癌治疗相关健康状态的时间权衡效用的稳定性。
Qual Life Res. 2002 Aug;11(5):405-14. doi: 10.1023/a:1015609126536.
7
Cryosurgery for prostate cancer: new technology and indications.前列腺癌的冷冻手术:新技术与适应症
Curr Urol Rep. 2000 May;1(1):41-7. doi: 10.1007/s11934-000-0034-0.