Kanayama M, Ng J T, Cunningham B W, Abumi K, Kaneda K, McAfee P C
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Mar 1;24(5):445-50. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199903010-00007.
Spinal reconstruction procedures for metastasis evaluated biomechanically using human cadaver specimens.
To investigate the stiffness of anterior versus circumferential spinal reconstructions for different anatomic stages of tumor lesions.
Metastatic tumors predominantly involve the vertebral bodies. Although anterior instrumentation and strut grafts provide excellent stability, it remains unclear to what extent vertebral destruction requires anterior reconstructions alone versus combined anterior and posterior procedures.
Ten human cadaveric thoracolumbar spines were used. The L1 vertebral body and posterior elements were resected sequentially based on Weinstein's anatomic zone classification for tumor lesions. Anterior reconstruction was performed between T12 and L2 using an iliac strut graft and the Kaneda SR system (AcroMed, Cleveland, OH). For circumferential reconstruction, the Cotrel-Dubousset hook and rod system was combined with the anterior reconstruction procedure. Experimental groups included the intact condition and five reconstruction stages: anterior reconstructions for corpectomy, subtotal and total spondylectomies, and circumferential reconstructions for subtotal and total spondylectomies. Nondestructive biomechanical testing was performed under four different loading modes.
All the reconstruction groups except anterior instrumentation alone for total spondylectomy returned stiffness to a level equivalent or higher to that of the intact spine. There were no statistical differences observed between anterior and circumferential reconstruction for subtotal spondylectomy. Anterior instrumentation alone for total spondylectomy did not restore stiffness to the intact level, and demonstrated significantly lower stiffness than that of circumferential reconstruction.
For corpectomy or subtotal spondylectomy, anterior reconstruction alone can provide stiffness equivalent to circumferential reconstruction. However, total spondylectomy significantly reduces the anterior reconstruction stiffness, suggesting the need for combined anterior and posterior procedures.
使用人体尸体标本对脊柱转移瘤的重建手术进行生物力学评估。
研究针对肿瘤病变不同解剖阶段的前路与环形脊柱重建的刚度。
转移性肿瘤主要累及椎体。尽管前路内固定和支撑植骨可提供出色的稳定性,但对于椎体破坏在何种程度上需要单独的前路重建还是联合前后路手术仍不清楚。
使用10具人体胸腰椎尸体标本。根据温斯坦肿瘤病变解剖区域分类,依次切除L1椎体及后部结构。在T12和L2之间采用髂骨支撑植骨和Kaneda SR系统(AcroMed,克利夫兰,俄亥俄州)进行前路重建。对于环形重建,将Cotrel-Dubousset钩棒系统与前路重建手术相结合。实验组包括完整状态和五个重建阶段:椎体次全切除、全椎体切除的前路重建,以及椎体次全切除、全椎体切除的环形重建。在四种不同加载模式下进行无损生物力学测试。
除全椎体切除单独前路内固定外,所有重建组的刚度均恢复到与完整脊柱相当或更高的水平。椎体次全切除的前路与环形重建之间未观察到统计学差异。全椎体切除单独前路内固定未将刚度恢复到完整水平,且显示出明显低于环形重建的刚度。
对于椎体次全切除或全椎体切除,单独前路重建可提供与环形重建相当的刚度。然而,全椎体切除显著降低了前路重建的刚度,提示需要联合前后路手术。