Nabar A, Rodriguez L M, Timmermans C, van den Dool A, Smeets J L, Wellens H J
Department of Cardiology, Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Circulation. 1999 Mar 23;99(11):1441-5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.11.1441.
The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that the occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF), in at least some patients with coexisting type I atrial flutter (AFL), is based on macro-reentry around the tricuspid valve orifice, including the right atrial (RA) isthmus, by evaluation of AF recurrences after successful ablation of AFL.
Eighty-two consecutive patients with type I AFL, with or without concomitant AF, underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the RA isthmus by an anatomical approach. The results were analyzed in 4 groups of patients: group 1 (only AFL; 29 patients), group 2 (AFL >AF; 22 patients), group 3 (AF >AFL; 15 patients), and group 4 (developing AFL while receiving class IC antiarrhythmic drug therapy for AF, the "class IC atrial flutter"; 16 patients). In all groups, RFA of type I AFL was performed with a high (>/=93%) procedural success rate. In group 1, only 2 patients (8%) had AF after (18+/-14 months) AFL ablation. These figures were 38% (20+/-14 months) and 86% (13+/-8 months) in groups 2 and 3, respectively. Group 4 patients (4+/-2 months) had a 73% freedom of AF recurrences with continuation of the class IC agent.
The low incidence of new AF during long-term follow-up after RFA of type I AFL makes it unlikely that radiofrequency lesions promote the development of AF. The impact of isthmus ablation on AF recurrences differs according to the clinically predominant atrial arrhythmia and suggests a possible role of the RA isthmus in the occurrence of AF in some patients. Ablation of class IC atrial flutter in patients with therapy-resistant AF is a novel approach to management of this patient subset. Careful classification of AF patients plays a role in the selection of the site of ablation therapy.
本研究的目的是通过评估I型心房扑动(AFL)成功消融后房颤(AF)的复发情况,验证以下假设:至少部分合并I型AFL的患者发生AF是基于围绕三尖瓣口(包括右心房峡部)的大折返。
82例连续的I型AFL患者,无论是否合并AF,均采用解剖学方法对右心房峡部进行射频消融(RFA)。将患者分为4组进行分析:第1组(仅AFL;29例患者),第2组(AFL>AF;22例患者),第3组(AF>AFL;15例患者),第4组(在接受IC类抗心律失常药物治疗AF时发生AFL,即“IC类心房扑动”;16例患者)。所有组I型AFL的RFA手术成功率均较高(≥93%)。第1组中,仅2例患者(8%)在AFL消融后(18±14个月)发生AF。第2组和第3组的这一比例分别为38%(20±14个月)和86%(13±8个月)。第4组患者(4±2个月)在继续使用IC类药物的情况下,AF复发率为73%。
I型AFL射频消融术后长期随访中,新发AF的发生率较低,提示射频消融损伤不太可能促进AF的发生。峡部消融对AF复发的影响因临床上占主导的房性心律失常而异,提示右心房峡部在部分患者AF发生中可能起作用。对药物治疗无效的AF患者进行IC类心房扑动消融是治疗该类患者的一种新方法。对AF患者进行仔细分类有助于选择消融治疗部位。