Suppr超能文献

重复压力-流率研究在评估良性前列腺增生所致膀胱出口梗阻中的应用。非那雄胺尿动力学研究组。

Repeated pressure-flow studies in the evaluation of bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic enlargement. Finasteride Urodynamics Study Group.

作者信息

Tammela T L, Schäfer W, Barrett D M, Abrams P, Hedlund H, Rollema H J, Matos-Ferreira A, Nordling J, Bruskewitz R, Miller P, Kirby R, Andersen J T, Jacobsen C, Gormley G J, Malice M P, Bach M A

机构信息

Division of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 1999;18(1):17-24. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6777(1999)18:1<17::aid-nau4>3.0.co;2-m.

Abstract

Test-retest reliability of repeated voids in pressure-flow studies and the influence on maximum flow rate (Q(max)pQ), detrusor pressure at maximum flow rate (p(det)Qmax), voided volume, and residual urine were studied. Also the agreement in interpretation of pressure-flow tracings between investigators and a single blinded central reader acting as a quality control center (QCC) were assessed. In addition, correlations between p(det)Qmax and patient age, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), free maximum flow rate (Qmax), and prostate volume were calculated. Using suprapubic pressure recording, 216 men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) were investigated in 11 centers. In each pressure-flow study, three sequential voids were performed, and quality controlled recordings were analyzed for Q(max)pQ and p(det)Qmax by the QCC. Trans rectal ultrasound was used to measure the prostate volume. Mean Q(max)pQ did not change, but p(det)Qmax decreased significantly in the second and third sequential voids. Using the Abrams-Griffiths nomogram definition of obstruction, 125 patients (67%) were classified as obstructed from the first void, but only 111 patients (59%) from the third void. The agreement between the investigator assessment and that of a single blinded reader was good. There was no significant correlation between p(det)Qmax and patient age, IPSS, and Qmax, whereas a modest correlation was found between p(det)Qmax and prostate volume. In summary, there was no significant change in Q(max)pQ, but p(det)Qmax decreased for the three consecutive voids, which can be explained by a decrease in outlet resistance. The agreement between the investigator and QCC interpretations shows the value of a standardized technique, supporting the feasibility of multicenter urodynamic studies. There is a modest, but statistically significant, correlation between detrusor pressure and prostate size, supporting the hypothesis that prostate size is a contributing factor in symptomatic BPH.

摘要

研究了压力-流率研究中重复排尿的重测信度及其对最大尿流率(Q(max)pQ)、最大尿流率时逼尿肌压力(p(det)Qmax)、排尿量和残余尿量的影响。此外,还评估了研究者与作为质量控制中心(QCC)的单盲中央阅片者对压力-流率描记图解读的一致性。另外,计算了p(det)Qmax与患者年龄、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、自由最大尿流率(Qmax)和前列腺体积之间的相关性。采用耻骨上压力记录法,在11个中心对216例因良性前列腺增生(BPE)导致下尿路症状(LUTS)的男性进行了研究。在每项压力-流率研究中,进行了三次连续排尿,QCC对质量控制记录进行分析以得出Q(max)pQ和p(det)Qmax。经直肠超声用于测量前列腺体积。平均Q(max)pQ没有变化,但在第二次和第三次连续排尿时p(det)Qmax显著降低。根据阿布拉姆斯-格里菲思列线图梗阻定义,125例患者(67%)首次排尿时被分类为梗阻,但第三次排尿时只有111例患者(59%)被分类为梗阻。研究者评估与单盲阅片者评估之间的一致性良好。p(det)Qmax与患者年龄、IPSS和Qmax之间无显著相关性,而p(det)Qmax与前列腺体积之间存在适度相关性。总之,Q(max)pQ无显著变化,但连续三次排尿时p(det)Qmax降低,这可以用出口阻力降低来解释。研究者与QCC解读之间的一致性表明了标准化技术的价值,支持了多中心尿动力学研究的可行性。逼尿肌压力与前列腺大小之间存在适度但具有统计学意义的相关性,支持了前列腺大小是有症状良性前列腺增生的一个促成因素这一假设。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验