Garg Gaurav, Sankhwar Satya Narayan, Goel Apul, Pandey Siddharth, Sharma Deepanshu, Parihar Anit
Department of Urology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
Department of Radiodiagnosis, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2019 May;11(3):163-168. doi: 10.1111/luts.12256. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
This study investigated whether the resistive index (RI) of prostate and bladder sonomorphologic parameters (total prostate volume [TPV], detrusor wall thickness [DWT], intraprostatic protrusion [IPP]) can be used instead of urodynamic studies (UDS) to predict bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).
Men aged ≥50 years with clinical BPH/LUTS were prospectively enrolled included. Basic evaluations, measurement of sonomorphologic parameters, and UDS were performed in accordance with the International Continence Society's Good Urodynamics Practices protocol.
Data of 240 patients were divided into two groups based on the BOO index(BOOI). Group 1 consisted of patients negative for BOO (BOOI <40), whereas Group 2 consisted of patients positive for BOO (BOOI > 40). Patient age, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life score and post-void residual volume were comparable between the two groups, whereas significant differences were evident in peak flow rate, TPV, DWT, RI, and IPP (P < 0.01 for all). Pearson correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation between BOOI and DWT (r = 0.198, P = 0.002), IPP (r = 0.450, P = 0.000), and RI (r = 0.334, P = 0.000). Multiple regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between BOOI and IPP (β = 0.382, P = 0.000) and RI (β = 0.226, P = 0.000). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under curve was 0.785 for RI (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.703-0.867, P < 0.001) and 0.905 for IPP (95% CI 0.850-0.961, P < 0.001). At a cut-off value of 7.5 mm for IPP, the sensitivity was 86.9%, specificity was 83.3% and positive predictive value was 92.41%.
IPP and RI may be the best non-invasive predictors for BOO in selected patients with LUTS/BPH.
本研究调查前列腺和膀胱超声形态学参数(前列腺总体积[TPV]、逼尿肌壁厚度[DWT]、前列腺内突入[IPP])的阻力指数(RI)是否可用于替代尿动力学检查(UDS),以预测下尿路症状(LUTS)的良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者的膀胱出口梗阻(BOO)。
前瞻性纳入年龄≥50岁的临床BPH/LUTS男性患者。根据国际尿控协会的良好尿动力学实践方案进行基本评估、超声形态学参数测量和UDS。
根据膀胱出口梗阻指数(BOOI)将240例患者的数据分为两组。第1组由膀胱出口梗阻阴性患者(BOOI<40)组成,而第2组由膀胱出口梗阻阳性患者(BOOI>40)组成。两组患者的年龄、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分和排尿后残余尿量相当,而在最大尿流率、TPV、DWT、RI和IPP方面存在显著差异(所有P<0.01)。Pearson相关性分析显示BOOI与DWT(r=0.198,P=0.002)、IPP(r=0.450,P=0.000)和RI(r=0.334,P=0.000)之间存在显著相关性。多元回归分析显示BOOI与IPP(β=0.382,P=0.000)和RI(β=0.226,P=0.000)之间存在显著相关性。受试者工作特征分析显示,RI的曲线下面积为0.785(95%置信区间[CI]0.703-0.867,P<0.001),IPP的曲线下面积为0.905(95%CI 0.850-0.961,P<0.001)。IPP的截断值为7.5mm时,敏感性为86.9%,特异性为83.3%,阳性预测值为92.41%。
IPP和RI可能是部分LUTS/BPH患者BOO的最佳非侵入性预测指标。