Tse H F, Lau C P, Ayers G M
Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, China.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999 Feb;10(2):125-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1999.tb00653.x.
The regional changes in atrial electrophysiologic properties related to atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) and chronic AF (CAF) remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the regional changes in atrial electrophysiology in patients with AF.
We evaluated the atrial electrophysiology at different sites (high right atrium, low right atrium [LRA], and distal coronary sinus [DCS]) in 11 patients with CAF, 8 patients with PAF, and 10 controls. Patients with CAF had significantly prolonged interatrial conduction and corrected sinus node recovery time, and shortened atrial effective refractory period (ERP) with loss of rate-related adaptation in the DCS, but had paradoxic prolongation of atrial ERP in the LRA, as compared with patients with PAF and the controls. As a result, the spatial distribution of atrial ERP that was observed in the controls and in patients with PAF was reversed in patients with CAF, without an increase in the dispersion of atrial refractoriness. Patients with PAF showed intermediate changes in atrial conduction times and atrial refractoriness as compared with patients with CAF and controls.
There was a regional heterogeneity on the changes of atrial electrophysiology in different parts of the atrium, and the "normal" spatial distribution of atrial refractoriness was reversed in patients with CAF. The electrophysiologic changes observed in patients with PAF appear to behave as if in transition from the control state to CAF, suggesting progressive changes in atrial electrophysiologic properties.
阵发性房颤(PAF)和慢性房颤(CAF)患者中与房颤(AF)相关的心房电生理特性的区域变化仍不清楚。本研究的目的是调查房颤患者心房电生理的区域变化。
我们评估了11例慢性房颤患者、8例阵发性房颤患者和10例对照者不同部位(高位右心房、低位右心房[LRA]和远端冠状窦[DCS])的心房电生理。与阵发性房颤患者和对照者相比,慢性房颤患者的房间传导时间显著延长,窦房结恢复时间校正后延长,远端冠状窦的心房有效不应期(ERP)缩短且与心率相关的适应性丧失,但低位右心房的心房ERP呈反常延长。结果,慢性房颤患者中观察到的对照者和阵发性房颤患者心房ERP的空间分布发生了反转,而心房不应期离散度并未增加。与慢性房颤患者和对照者相比,阵发性房颤患者的心房传导时间和心房不应期变化处于中间状态。
心房不同部位的心房电生理变化存在区域异质性,慢性房颤患者心房不应期的“正常”空间分布发生了反转。阵发性房颤患者观察到的电生理变化似乎表现为从对照状态向慢性房颤的转变,提示心房电生理特性的渐进性变化。