Gaita F, Calò L, Riccardi R, Garberoglio L, Scaglione M, Licciardello G, Coda L, Di Donna P, Bocchiardo M, Caponi D, Antolini R, Orzan F, Trevi G P
Division of Cardiology, Civil Hospital, Asti, Italy.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Feb;37(2):534-41. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)01120-7.
We aimed to evaluate: 1) the behavior of electrical activity simultaneously in different atrial regions during atrial fibrillation (AF); 2) the difference of atrial activation between paroxysmal and chronic AF; 3) the atrial refractoriness dispersion; and 4) the correlation between the effective refractory periods (ERPs) and the FF intervals.
Little data exist on the electrophysiologic characteristics of the different atrial regions in patients with AF. A more detailed knowledge of the electrical activity during AF may provide further insights to improve treatment of AF.
Right and left atria were extensively mapped in 30 patients with idiopathic AF (18 paroxysmal and 12 chronic). In different atrial locations, we analyzed 1) the FF interval duration; and 2) the grade of organization and, in case of organized electrical activity, the direction of atrial activation. Furthermore, in patients with paroxysmal AF, we determined the atrial ERP, evaluated the ERP dispersion and assessed the presence of a correlation between the ERPs and the FF intervals.
In patients with chronic AF, we observed a shortening of the FF intervals and a greater prevalence of disorganized activity in all the atrial sites examined. In patients with paroxysmal AF, a significant dispersion of refractoriness was observed. The right lateral wall showed longer FF intervals and more organized atrial activity and, unexpectedly, the shortest mean ERPs. In contrast, the septal area showed shorter FF intervals, greater disorganization and the longest mean ERPs.
Electrical activity during AF showed a significant spatial inhomogeneity, which was more evident in patients with paroxysmal AF. The mean FF intervals did not correlate with the mean ERPs.
我们旨在评估:1)心房颤动(AF)期间不同心房区域同时的电活动行为;2)阵发性和慢性AF之间心房激动的差异;3)心房不应期离散度;4)有效不应期(ERP)与FF间期之间的相关性。
关于AF患者不同心房区域的电生理特征的数据很少。对AF期间电活动的更详细了解可能为改善AF治疗提供进一步的见解。
对30例特发性AF患者(18例阵发性和12例慢性)的右心房和左心房进行广泛标测。在不同的心房位置,我们分析了:1)FF间期持续时间;2)电活动的组织程度,以及在有组织电活动的情况下,心房激动的方向。此外,对阵发性AF患者,我们测定了心房ERP,评估了ERP离散度,并评估了ERP与FF间期之间是否存在相关性。
在慢性AF患者中,我们观察到所有检查的心房部位FF间期缩短,且无组织活动的发生率更高。在阵发性AF患者中,观察到明显的不应期离散。右外侧壁显示出更长的FF间期和更有组织的心房活动,出乎意料的是,其平均ERP最短。相比之下,间隔区域显示出较短的FF间期、更高的无组织性和最长的平均ERP。
AF期间的电活动显示出明显的空间不均匀性,这在阵发性AF患者中更为明显。平均FF间期与平均ERP不相关。