Robertson D M
Br J Ophthalmol. 1976 Dec;60(12):835-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.60.12.835.
Two false-negative results from 32P testing for histologically verified malignant melanomas of the choroid are reported. In the first case, a haemorrhagic choroidal detachment caused an increase in probe; additionally, the tumour was necrotic. Both factors are likely to have contributed to the false-negative result. A satisfactory explanation for the false-negative result in the second case was not determined, although it may have accurately reflected a period of minimal tumour activity, inasmuch as repeat 32P testing was strongly positive eight months later, when unequivocal evidence of tumour growth was present. An alternative explanation is that the orally administered 32P was incompletely absorbed. Since 32P testing is frequently accompanied by significant manipulation both in the manoeuvre associated with tumour localization and in that associated with the actual radioactive counting, it would seem desirable to perform indicated enucleation immediately after completion of the 32P testing. While the properly performed 32P test remains a valuable diagnostic test for helping to establish the presence or absence of malignancies of the posterior globe, it is important to guard against the tendency to underestimate careful clinical evaluation.
报告了2例经组织学证实的脉络膜恶性黑色素瘤32P检测结果为假阴性的情况。在第一例中,出血性脉络膜脱离导致探测器读数增加;此外,肿瘤坏死。这两个因素可能都导致了假阴性结果。第二例假阴性结果的原因未明确,尽管它可能准确反映了肿瘤活动最低的时期,因为8个月后重复32P检测呈强阳性,当时有明确的肿瘤生长证据。另一种解释是口服的32P吸收不完全。由于32P检测在与肿瘤定位相关的操作以及实际放射性计数相关的操作中经常伴随着大量操作,似乎在32P检测完成后应立即进行必要的眼球摘除术。虽然正确进行的32P检测仍然是一项有助于确定眼球后部是否存在恶性肿瘤的有价值的诊断测试,但重要的是要防止低估仔细临床评估的倾向。