Knop C, Knop C, Thermann H, Blauth M, Bastian L, Zwipp H, Tscherne H
Unfallchirurgische Klinik, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.
Unfallchirurg. 1999 Jan;102(1):23-8. doi: 10.1007/s001130050368.
Previous studies concerning ruptures of the lateral ligaments of the ankle dealt with acute first ruptures. There are a few articles about chronic instability of the ankle but no prospective investigations have been reported concerning the treatment of recurrent ruptures. Good results were obtained following after non-operative treatment of acute ruptures of the fibular ligaments of the ankle joint. This prospectively randomized study was commenced to test whether recidivations of the rupture of the lateral ligaments can also be treated non-operatively or if they are in need of operative repair. The second question to be answered was whether these injuries should be treated differently depending on the treatment of the first rupture. From December 1986 to November 1989, 109 patients with a recidivation of a rupture of the ankle joint lateral ligaments were included in this prospective trial at the Department of Trauma Surgery, Hannover Medical School. They were divided into two groups depending on the therapy used to treat the first injury: The relapse was classified as a second-stage-rupture in cases where treatment of the first ligament rupture did not involve an operation and as a rerupture if the initial rupture was surgically repaired. Half of each group was treated randomly either with surgical ligament repair or without. A total of 100 patients (92%) at an average age of 24 years (11 to 49 years) was seen for follow-up examination one year after the relapse: The follow-up included the patient's subjective assessment, a clinical examination, and stress radiography. A 70 point score was used for evaluation of the total result. Two wound infections requiring reoperation were observed in the operative treatment groups. The follow-up examination revealed better results in both operative treatment groups (A and C), which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Patients with a second-stage-rupture showed a significantly higher (P < 0.001) stability by stress radiography after surgical treatment (group A) in contrast to non-operative treatment (group B). In addition, the subjective and clinical results indicated a tendency towards better results which were not statistically significant (P < 0.09 and P < 0.07). In cases of rerupture the patient's subjective assessment revealed significantly more (P < 0.05) complaints after non-operative treatment (group D). Clinical results were comparable, and radiologic assessment showed a tendency towards higher joint stability after surgical treatment (group C), although it was not statistically significant (P < 0.07). Based on the results presented, the authors recommend the surgical repair of ankle joint ligaments in cases of second-stage- or rerupture.
以往关于踝关节外侧韧带断裂的研究均针对急性首次断裂。关于踝关节慢性不稳定的文章较少,且尚无关于复发性断裂治疗的前瞻性研究报道。踝关节腓侧韧带急性断裂采用非手术治疗取得了良好效果。开展这项前瞻性随机研究旨在检验踝关节外侧韧带断裂复发是否也可采用非手术治疗,或者是否需要手术修复。另一个需要回答的问题是,这些损伤是否应根据首次断裂的治疗方式不同而区别对待。1986年12月至1989年11月,汉诺威医学院创伤外科将109例踝关节外侧韧带断裂复发患者纳入这项前瞻性试验。根据首次损伤的治疗方式将他们分为两组:首次韧带断裂治疗未涉及手术的复发归为二期断裂,首次断裂进行手术修复的复发归为再断裂。每组中的一半患者随机接受手术韧带修复或不接受手术。复发后一年,共100例患者(92%)接受随访检查,平均年龄24岁(11至49岁):随访包括患者主观评估、临床检查和应力位X线片检查。采用70分制评分评估总体结果。手术治疗组观察到两例伤口感染需要再次手术。随访检查显示,两个手术治疗组(A组和C组)效果更好,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与非手术治疗(B组)相比,二期断裂患者手术治疗(A组)后应力位X线片显示稳定性显著更高(P<0.001)。此外,主观和临床结果显示有向好趋势,但无统计学意义(P<0.09和P<0.07)。再断裂病例中患者主观评估显示,非手术治疗(D组)后抱怨明显更多(P<0.05)。临床结果相当,影像学评估显示手术治疗(C组)后关节稳定性有升高趋势,尽管无统计学意义(P<0.07)。基于上述结果,作者建议二期断裂或再断裂病例行踝关节韧带手术修复。