• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

格拉司琼注射液用于治疗造血器官肿瘤中非顺铂诱导的癌症化疗所致恶心/呕吐的给药方法比较研究。血液系统恶性肿瘤的京阪神研究组。

A comparative study of administration methods of granisetron injection used to treat nausea/vomiting induced by cancer chemotherapy without cisplatin in tumors of hematopoietic organs. Keihanshin Study Group of Hematological Malignancies.

作者信息

Tatsumi N, Masaoka T

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine, Osaka City University Medical School, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1999;43(5):379-84. doi: 10.1007/s002800050910.

DOI:10.1007/s002800050910
PMID:10100592
Abstract

PURPOSE

The antiemetic effect of granisetron injection at a dose of 40 microg/kg used in the treatment of nausea/vomiting induced by multidrug combined cancer chemotherapy excluding cisplatin in patients with tumors of hematopoietic organs was evaluated by comparing a 30-min infusion and a slow intravenous injection given over 30 s.

METHODS

A two-group random-allocation comparative study was performed with the cooperation of multiple institutions using a central registration system.

RESULTS

In the treatment of acute clinical symptoms, appetite was described as "similar to that during good health" by 61.1% of patients (55/93) in the instillation group and by 47.3% (44/93) in the slow injection group, a significant advantage in the infusion group. However, no significant differences in the number of episodes of vomiting, the severity of nausea or clinical efficacy were found. In the final clinical evaluation and assessment of usefulness based on the subjective judgement of physicians throughout the entire therapeutic period, no differences were discernible. No side effects were reported for either method and there was no indication of a sex difference concerning efficacy. However, the efficacy in patients with an anemic tendency was slightly inferior.

CONCLUSIONS

The maintenance of appetite during the administration of anticancer drugs is very important to maintain patients' daily activities and quality of life. The present results support the usefulness of infusion of granisetron as an administration method during chemotherapy for malignant hemopathy.

摘要

目的

通过比较30分钟输注和30秒缓慢静脉注射,评估格拉司琼注射液40μg/kg剂量用于治疗造血器官肿瘤患者非顺铂多药联合癌症化疗所致恶心/呕吐的止吐效果。

方法

采用中央登记系统,在多个机构合作下进行了两组随机分配的比较研究。

结果

在急性临床症状治疗中,滴注组61.1%(55/93)的患者将食欲描述为“与身体健康时相似”,缓慢注射组为47.3%(44/93),滴注组有显著优势。然而,呕吐发作次数、恶心严重程度或临床疗效方面未发现显著差异。在整个治疗期间基于医生主观判断的最终临床评估和有用性评估中,未发现差异。两种方法均未报告副作用,且未表明疗效存在性别差异。然而,有贫血倾向患者的疗效略差。

结论

抗癌药物给药期间维持食欲对于维持患者日常活动和生活质量非常重要。目前结果支持格拉司琼输注作为恶性血液病化疗期间给药方法的有用性。

相似文献

1
A comparative study of administration methods of granisetron injection used to treat nausea/vomiting induced by cancer chemotherapy without cisplatin in tumors of hematopoietic organs. Keihanshin Study Group of Hematological Malignancies.格拉司琼注射液用于治疗造血器官肿瘤中非顺铂诱导的癌症化疗所致恶心/呕吐的给药方法比较研究。血液系统恶性肿瘤的京阪神研究组。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1999;43(5):379-84. doi: 10.1007/s002800050910.
2
[Efficacy and safety of two methods of administration of granisetron injection for nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy for tumors in hematopoietic organs--a randomized crossover comparison between intravenous drip infusion and intravenous bolus injection].格拉司琼注射液两种给药方法对造血器官肿瘤化疗所致恶心呕吐的疗效与安全性——静脉滴注与静脉推注的随机交叉比较
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1998 Sep;25(11):1747-53.
3
Efficacy of intravenous granisetron to control nausea and vomiting during multiple cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy.静脉注射格拉司琼在多周期顺铂化疗中控制恶心和呕吐的疗效。
Cancer Invest. 1998;16(2):87-93. doi: 10.3109/07357909809039762.
4
[Comparison of antiemetic efficacy of granisetron as premedication versus combination therapy of granisetron].格拉司琼作为术前用药与格拉司琼联合治疗的止吐疗效比较
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1998 Oct;25(12):1947-53.
5
[Clinical evaluation of granisetron injection against nausea and vomiting induced by anticancer drugs including cisplatin].[格拉司琼注射液对抗包括顺铂在内的抗癌药物所致恶心和呕吐的临床评价]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1994 Aug;21(10):1641-6.
6
[Comparison of effects between single vs five-day injection of granisetron for combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil for head and neck cancer].
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1997 Jul;24(9):1095-101.
7
Comparison of tropisetron and granisetron in the control of nausea and vomiting in children receiving combined cancer chemotherapy.托烷司琼与格拉司琼在接受联合癌症化疗儿童中控制恶心和呕吐的比较。
Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2001 Sep;18(6):397-406. doi: 10.1080/088800101316922029.
8
[Comparison of 1 mg/body and 3 mg/body of intravenous granisetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and adverse events in hematological malignancy patients].[静脉注射1毫克/体质量和3毫克/体质量格拉司琼预防血液系统恶性肿瘤患者化疗引起的恶心、呕吐及不良事件的比较]
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2012;132(5):675-81. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.132.675.
9
[Clinical evaluation of granisetron hydrochloride against nausea and vomiting induced by anticancer drugs for gynecological malignant tumors].盐酸格拉司琼对抗妇科恶性肿瘤抗癌药物所致恶心和呕吐的临床评价
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1996 Jan;23(1):87-91.
10
A randomized study of the efficacy and safety of transdermal granisetron in the control of nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in Korean patients.一项关于透皮应用格拉司琼对韩国患者中度致吐性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐进行控制的疗效及安全性的随机研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jun;23(6):1769-77. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2507-6. Epub 2014 Dec 3.