Sturm P D, Rauws E A, Hruban R H, Caspers E, Ramsoekh T B, Huibregtse K, Noorduyn L A, Offerhaus G J
Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Cancer Res. 1999 Mar;5(3):629-35.
Extrahepatic biliary stenosis can be caused by benign and malignant disorders. In most cases, a tissue diagnosis is needed for optimal management of patients, but the sensitivity of biliary cytology for the diagnosis of a malignancy is relatively low. The additional diagnostic value of K-ras mutational analysis of endobiliary brush cytology was assessed. Endobiliary brush cytology specimens obtained during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography were prospectively collected from 312 consecutive patients with extrahepatic biliary stenosis. The results of conventional light microscopic cytology and K-ras codon 12 mutational analysis were compared and evaluated in view of the final diagnosis made by histological examination of the stenotic lesion and/or patient follow-up. The sensitivities of cytology and mutational analysis to detect malignancy were 36 and 42%, respectively. When both tests were combined, the sensitivity increased to 62%. The specificity of cytology was 98%, and the specificity of the mutational analysis and of both tests combined was 89%. Positive predictive values for cytology, mutational analysis, and both tests combined were 98, 92, and 94%, whereas the corresponding negative predictive values were 34, 34, and 44%, respectively. The sensitivity of K-ras mutational analysis was 63% for pancreatic carcinomas compared to 27% for bile duct, gallbladder, and ampullary carcinomas. K-ras mutational analysis can be considered supplementary to conventional light microscopy of endobiliary brush cytology to diagnose patients with malignant extrahepatic biliary stenosis, particularly in the case of pancreatic cancer. The presence of a K-ras codon 12 mutation in endobiliary brush cytology per se supports a clinical suspicion of malignancy, even when the conventional cytology is negative or equivocal.
肝外胆管狭窄可由良性和恶性疾病引起。在大多数情况下,患者的最佳治疗需要组织诊断,但胆管细胞学对恶性肿瘤诊断的敏感性相对较低。评估了胆管刷检细胞学K-ras突变分析的附加诊断价值。前瞻性收集了312例连续性肝外胆管狭窄患者在内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中获得的胆管刷检细胞学标本。根据狭窄病变的组织学检查和/或患者随访做出的最终诊断,对传统光学显微镜细胞学结果和K-ras密码子12突变分析结果进行了比较和评估。细胞学和突变分析检测恶性肿瘤的敏感性分别为36%和42%。当两种检测方法联合使用时,敏感性提高到62%。细胞学的特异性为98%,突变分析以及两种检测方法联合的特异性为89%。细胞学、突变分析以及两种检测方法联合的阳性预测值分别为98%、92%和94%,而相应的阴性预测值分别为34%、34%和44%。K-ras突变分析对胰腺癌的敏感性为63%,而对胆管癌、胆囊癌和壶腹癌的敏感性为27%。K-ras突变分析可被视为胆管刷检细胞学传统光学显微镜检查的补充,用于诊断恶性肝外胆管狭窄患者,特别是在胰腺癌的情况下。即使传统细胞学检查结果为阴性或不明确,胆管刷检细胞学中存在K-ras密码子12突变本身也支持临床对恶性肿瘤的怀疑。