Machado P P, Beutler L E, Greenberg L S
Universidade do Minho, Departamento de Psicologia, Braga, Portugal.
J Clin Psychol. 1999 Jan;55(1):39-57. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199901)55:1<39::aid-jclp4>3.0.co;2-v.
Accurately identifying another person's emotional state is an ability that may be necessary for a psychotherapist to empathize with a patient and that may be required for obtaining valid and reliable psychotherapy process ratings in research. Accuracy of identifying emotions and of rating emotional intensity expressed by a patient was studied in a comparison of 36 experienced therapists and 36 undergraduate psychology students who intended to become psychotherapists. Representative segments of a psychotherapy session were presented in one of three ways to tease apart the relative importance of verbal and nonverbal cues in making accurate ratings. Accuracy was judged against ratings supplied by two experienced and prestigious clinicians based on the same therapy sample. Results indicated that although therapists were more accurate than nontherapists in identifying emotions, they did not differ in the accuracy of rating emotional intensity. Moreover, accuracy of ratings was found to be less reliant on verbal cues among psychotherapists than among nontherapists. Finally, levels of participants' personal awareness of their own emotions had a positive impact on the accuracy of identifying specific emotions but not on the accuracy of rating their intensity.
准确识别他人的情绪状态是一种能力,对于心理治疗师理解患者可能是必要的,并且在研究中获得有效且可靠的心理治疗过程评分时也可能是必需的。在一项研究中,对36名经验丰富的治疗师和36名打算成为心理治疗师的本科心理学学生进行了比较,研究了识别患者表达的情绪以及对情绪强度进行评分的准确性。以三种方式之一呈现心理治疗过程的代表性片段,以区分言语和非言语线索在进行准确评分中的相对重要性。根据两名经验丰富且有声望的临床医生基于相同治疗样本提供的评分来判断准确性。结果表明,虽然治疗师在识别情绪方面比非治疗师更准确,但在对情绪强度进行评分的准确性方面并无差异。此外,发现治疗师的评分准确性比非治疗师更少依赖言语线索。最后,参与者对自身情绪的个人觉察水平对识别特定情绪的准确性有积极影响,但对评分其强度的准确性没有影响。