Kuo A A, Slavin S J
Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Pediatrics. 1999 Apr;103(4 Pt 2):898-901.
To compare general pediatric knowledge acquisition and clinical problem-solving skills by students pre- and postcurricular reform based on the 1994 Ambulatory Pediatric Association and the Council on Medical Student Education in Pediatrics (APA-COMSEP) curricular guidelines.
A large, urban academic medical center.
Third-year medical students on a required clerkship in Pediatrics.
Pre- and postcurricular revision, the students were given both the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Pediatric Subject Examination and an objective examination, which was developed in-house, based on the APA-COMSEP guidelines (Pediatric Clerkship Examination [PCE]). Baseline data before curricular revision were obtained on 52 students from May 1995 to May 1996. After curricular redesign in May 1996, data were obtained on 42 students from May 1996 to May 1997. Curricular revision focused on the following: defining educational principles, selecting teaching strategies, defining learning objectives, implementing the curriculum, and evaluating the students with an examination.
Before curricular revision, the average NBME score was 521 +/- 122. The average PCE score was 53.7% +/- 10.1%. After curricular revision, the average NBME score was 520 +/- 109, and the average PCE score was 67.7% +/- 8.4%. Content areas showing the greatest improvement were fluids and electrolytes, issues pertaining to the newborn, and health supervision.
Our baseline data indicate that despite spending two thirds of the clerkship in the ambulatory setting, students did not acquire adequate general pediatric knowledge or clinical problem-solving ability. After broad clerkship revision based on the APA-COMSEP Core Curriculum, students' acquisition of general pediatric knowledge and clinical problem-solving improved significantly, as measured by the PCE. The overall NBME Pediatric Subject Examination scores did not reflect this increased acquisition of general pediatric knowledge.
根据1994年门诊儿科协会和儿科学医学生教育委员会(APA - COMSEP)课程指南,比较课程改革前后学生的儿科一般知识掌握情况和临床问题解决能力。
一家大型城市学术医疗中心。
参加儿科必修实习的三年级医学生。
在课程修订前后,学生们都接受了美国医学考试委员会(NBME)儿科科目考试和一项基于APA - COMSEP指南内部开发的客观考试(儿科实习考试[PCE])。1995年5月至1996年5月,对52名学生进行了课程修订前的基线数据收集。1996年5月课程重新设计后,1996年5月至1997年5月对42名学生进行了数据收集。课程修订重点如下:确定教育原则、选择教学策略、明确学习目标、实施课程以及通过考试评估学生。
课程修订前,NBME平均成绩为521±122。PCE平均成绩为53.7%±10.1%。课程修订后,NBME平均成绩为520±109,PCE平均成绩为67.7%±8.4%。改善最显著的内容领域是液体和电解质、新生儿相关问题以及健康监督。
我们的基线数据表明,尽管在门诊环境中实习时间占三分之二,但学生们并未获得足够的儿科一般知识或临床问题解决能力。基于APA - COMSEP核心课程进行广泛的实习修订后,通过PCE评估,学生们在儿科一般知识掌握和临床问题解决方面有显著提高。NBME儿科科目考试的总体成绩并未反映出儿科一般知识的这种增加的掌握情况。