Suppr超能文献

术后镇痛与呕吐,特别涉及日间手术:一项系统评价

Postoperative analgesia and vomiting, with special reference to day-case surgery: a systematic review.

作者信息

McQuay H J, Moore R A

机构信息

Pain Research & Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, Oxford Radcliffe Hospital Trust, Churchill Hospital, Oxford.

出版信息

Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(12):1-236.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Day-case surgery is of great value to patients and the health service. It enables many more patients to be treated properly, and faster than before. Newer, less invasive, operative techniques will allow many more procedures to be carried out. There are many elements to successful day-case surgery. Two key components are the effectiveness of the control of pain after the operation, and the effectiveness of measures to minimise postoperative nausea and vomiting.

OBJECTIVES

To enable those caring for patients undergoing day-case surgery to make the best choices for their patients and the health service, this review sought the highest quality evidence on: (1) the effectiveness of the control of pain after an operation; (2) the effectiveness of measures to minimise postoperative nausea and vomiting.

METHODS

Full details of the search strategy are presented in the report. RESULTS - ANALGESIA: The systematic reviews of the literature explored whether different interventions work and, if they do work, how well they work. A number of conclusions can be drawn. RESULTS-ANALGESIA, INEFFECTIVE INTERVENTIONS: There is good evidence that some interventions are ineffective. They include: (1) transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in acute postoperative pain; (2) the use of local injections of opioids at sites other than the knee joint; (3) the use of dihydrocodeine, 30 mg, in acute postoperative pain (it is no better than placebo). RESULTS-ANALGESIA, INTERVENTIONS OF DOUBTFUL VALUE: Some interventions may be effective but the size of the effect or the complication of undertaking them confers no measurable benefit over conventional methods. Such interventions include: (1) injecting morphine into the knee joint after surgery: there is a small analgesic benefit which may last for up to 24 hours but there is no clear evidence that the size of the benefit is of any clinical value; (2) manoeuvres to try and anticipate pain by using pre-emptive analgesia; these are no more effective than standard methods; (3) administering non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) by injection or per rectum in patients who can swallow; this appears to be no more effective than giving NSAIDs by mouth and, indeed, may do more harm than good; (4) administering codeine in single doses; this has poor analgesic efficacy. RESULTS-ANALGESIA, INTERVENTIONS OF PROVEN VALUE: These include a number of oral analgesics including (at standard doses): (1) dextropropoxyphene; (2) tramadol; (3) paracetamol; (4) ibuprofen; (5) diclofenac. Diclofenac and ibuprofen at standard doses give analgesia equivalent to that obtained with 10 mg of intramuscular morphine. Each will provide at least 50% pain relief from a single oral dose in patients with moderate or severe postoperative pain. Paracetamol and codeine combinations also appear to be highly effective, although there is little information on the standard doses used in the UK. The relative effectiveness of these analgesics is compared in an effectiveness 'ladder' which can inform prescribers making choices for individual patients, or planning day-case surgery. Dose-response relationships show that higher doses of ibuprofen may be particularly effective. Topical NSAIDs (applied to the skin) are effective in minor injuries and chronic pain but there is no obvious role for them in day-case surgery. RESULTS-POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING: The proportion of patients who may feel nauseated or vomit after surgery is very variable, despite similar operations and anaesthetic techniques. Systematic review can still lead to clear estimations of effectiveness of interventions. Whichever anti-emetic is used, the choice is often between prophylactic use (trying to prevent anyone vomiting) and treating those people who do feel nauseated or who may vomit. Systematic reviews of a number of different anti-emetics show clearly that none of the anti-emetics is sufficiently effective to be used for prophylaxis. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATE

摘要

背景

日间手术对患者和医疗服务具有重要价值。它能使更多患者得到恰当治疗,且比以往更快。更新的、侵入性更小的手术技术将使更多手术得以开展。成功的日间手术有诸多要素。两个关键组成部分是术后疼痛控制的有效性以及将术后恶心和呕吐降至最低的措施的有效性。

目的

为使那些照料接受日间手术患者的人员能为其患者和医疗服务做出最佳选择,本综述寻求关于以下方面的最高质量证据:(1)术后疼痛控制的有效性;(2)将术后恶心和呕吐降至最低的措施的有效性。

方法

报告中呈现了搜索策略的全部详细信息。结果 - 镇痛:对文献的系统评价探究了不同干预措施是否有效,以及如果有效,其效果如何。可以得出一些结论。结果 - 镇痛,无效干预措施:有充分证据表明某些干预措施无效。它们包括:(1)经皮电刺激神经疗法用于急性术后疼痛;(2)在膝关节以外部位局部注射阿片类药物;(3)使用30毫克双氢可待因治疗急性术后疼痛(其效果不优于安慰剂)。结果 - 镇痛,价值存疑的干预措施:一些干预措施可能有效,但效果大小或实施这些措施的并发症并未带来超过传统方法的可衡量益处。此类干预措施包括:(1)术后向膝关节注射吗啡:有轻微镇痛益处,可能持续长达24小时,但没有明确证据表明这种益处大小具有任何临床价值;(2)通过使用超前镇痛试图预测疼痛的手法;这些并不比标准方法更有效;(3)在能够吞咽的患者中通过注射或直肠给药非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs);这似乎并不比口服NSAIDs更有效,而且实际上可能弊大于利;(4)单次服用可待因;其镇痛效果不佳。结果 - 镇痛,已证实有价值的干预措施:这些包括多种口服镇痛药(标准剂量),包括:(1)右丙氧芬;(2)曲马多;(3)对乙酰氨基酚;(4)布洛芬;(5)双氯芬酸。标准剂量的双氯芬酸和布洛芬产生的镇痛效果等同于10毫克肌肉注射吗啡。对于中度或重度术后疼痛患者,每一种药物单次口服给药至少能缓解50%的疼痛。对乙酰氨基酚和可待因组合似乎也非常有效,尽管关于英国使用的标准剂量信息很少。在一个有效性“阶梯”中比较了这些镇痛药的相对有效性,这可为开处方者为个体患者做出选择或规划日间手术提供参考。剂量 - 反应关系表明,更高剂量的布洛芬可能特别有效。外用NSAIDs(应用于皮肤)对轻伤和慢性疼痛有效,但在日间手术中它们没有明显作用。结果 - 术后恶心和呕吐:尽管手术和麻醉技术相似,但术后可能感到恶心或呕吐的患者比例差异很大。系统评价仍能清晰估计干预措施的有效性。无论使用哪种止吐药,选择通常在预防性使用(试图防止任何人呕吐)和治疗那些确实感到恶心或可能呕吐的人之间。对多种不同止吐药的系统评价清楚地表明,没有一种止吐药足够有效可用于预防。(摘要截断)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验