Medical staff antitrust decisions examine defenses available to defendants.
出版信息
Hosp Law Newsl. 1990 Jun;7(8):1-6.
PMID:10104849
Abstract
The 1990 decisions reported on below concern defenses established by both legislation and judicial precedent. To the extent defenses preclude the need for a trial on the merits, the saving in time, effort and expense for the defendants can be considerable.
摘要
相似文献
1
Medical staff antitrust decisions examine defenses available to defendants.
Hosp Law Newsl. 1990 Jun;7(8):1-6.
2
Antitrust and hospital peer review.
Law Contemp Probl. 1988 Spring;51(2):7-92.
3
Antitrust immunity in Colorado peer review actions.
Hosp Law Newsl. 1989 Dec;7(2):1-5.
4
Antitrust. Is quality review in jeopardy?
Med World News. 1988 Jun 27;29(12):34-6, 38, 43-7.
5
Eleventh Circuit allows state action defense in medical staff antitrust case.
Hosp Law Newsl. 1989 Jan;6(3):1-5.
6
Perspectives. The Patrick case: implications for peer review.
Mcgraw Hills Med Health. 1988 May 30;42(22):suppl 4 p..
7
The antitrust laws: implications for physician staff privileges.
J Health Hum Resour Adm. 1987 Fall;10(2):206-18.
8
High court's override on Patrick renews concerns about peer review risk.
Bus Health. 1988 Jul;5(9):40-1.
9
A tale of four cases: Patrick, Bolt, Mitchell, and Oltz.
Med Staff Couns. 1989 Spring;3(2):51-4.
10
Antitrust laws should help NPs.反垄断法应该有助于执业护士。
Nurse Pract. 1987 Nov;12(11):39-40, 45, 48-9.
Zotero 插件