• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无处可藏:论研究当代政策过程中的种种不适。

No hiding place: on the discomforts of researching the contemporary policy process.

作者信息

Pollitt C, Harrison S, Hunter D J, Marnoch G

机构信息

Open University.

出版信息

J Soc Policy. 1990 Apr;19(2):169-90. doi: 10.1017/s0047279400001987.

DOI:10.1017/s0047279400001987
PMID:10106598
Abstract

It has never been easy to conduct research into currently sensitive policy issues, but there is now accumulating evidence to indicate that various forms of resistance to scholarly investigation are on the increase. Such a climate handicaps all social policy research, but may have the greatest impact on ethnographic projects. Yet, it is argued, ethnography is increasingly widely recognised among academics as having a particularly valuable contribution to make to the study of the policy process. Unfortunately, many policy practitioners (and occasionally some academic colleagues) perceive ethnographic research as being of questionable validity and low helpfulness. This behaves policy-oriented ethnographers to demonstrate that they do indeed have procedures for assuring validity, even if their style of investigation is never likely to be popular with government.

摘要

对当前敏感的政策问题进行研究从来都不是一件容易的事,但现在有越来越多的证据表明,对学术调查的各种抵制形式正在增加。这种氛围阻碍了所有社会政策研究,但可能对人种志项目影响最大。然而,有人认为,人种志在学术界越来越被广泛认可,认为它对政策过程的研究有特别宝贵的贡献。不幸的是,许多政策从业者(偶尔也有一些学术同事)认为人种志研究的有效性存疑且帮助不大。这使得以政策为导向的人种志研究者有必要证明他们确实有确保有效性的程序,即使他们的调查方式不太可能受到政府欢迎。

相似文献

1
No hiding place: on the discomforts of researching the contemporary policy process.无处可藏:论研究当代政策过程中的种种不适。
J Soc Policy. 1990 Apr;19(2):169-90. doi: 10.1017/s0047279400001987.
2
Evidence based policymaking.循证决策
BMJ. 1995 Jan 14;310(6972):71-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6972.71.
3
Research, policy, and the National Health Service.研究、政策与国民医疗服务体系。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1990 Fall;15(3):501-23. doi: 10.1215/03616878-15-3-501.
4
"The ghost of health services past" revisited: comparing British health policy of the 1950s with the 1980s and 1990s.重访“过去医疗服务的幽灵”:比较20世纪50年代与80年代及90年代的英国卫生政策。
Int J Health Serv. 2001;31(3):635-46. doi: 10.2190/A86C-TA6X-X47J-X1H8.
5
The contribution of social science research to health policy: the Royal Commission on the National Health Service.社会科学研究对卫生政策的贡献:国民健康服务皇家委员会
J Soc Policy. 1981;10(4):531-47. doi: 10.1017/s0047279400001562.
6
Factors affecting engagement between academic faculty and decision-makers: learnings and priorities for a school of public health.影响学术教师与决策者参与的因素:公共卫生学院的经验教训和优先事项。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 25;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0342-9.
7
For love or money: what makes us tick and leads to better health care.为了爱还是金钱:是什么驱动着我们以及如何带来更好的医疗保健。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Jul;7(3):184-5. doi: 10.1258/135581902760082508.
8
On dodgy data.
Health Serv J. 2012 Oct 4;122(6323):18-9.
9
Making health policy: networks in research and policy after 1945.制定卫生政策:1945年后研究与政策中的网络关系
Clio Med. 2005;75:5-37.
10
Policy on new workforce roles: a discussion paper.新员工角色政策:一篇讨论文件。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 May;44(4):635-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.08.008. Epub 2006 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Acting on the Evidence: The Challenges Facing Policy and Practice Comment on "Barriers and Opportunities for WHO 'Best Buys' Non-communicable Disease Policy Adoption and Implementation From a Political Economy Perspective: A Complexity Systematic Review".依据证据行事:政策与实践面临的挑战 对“从政治经济学视角看世卫组织‘最佳采购’非传染性疾病政策采纳与实施的障碍及机遇:一项复杂性系统评价”的评论
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:9022. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.9022. Epub 2025 May 27.
2
Negotiating multisectoral evidence: a qualitative study of knowledge exchange at the intersection of transport and public health.协商多部门证据:一项关于交通与公共卫生交叉领域知识交流的定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 5;17(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3940-x.
3
Perspectives of family physicians on computer-assisted health-risk assessments.家庭医生对计算机辅助健康风险评估的看法。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 May 7;12(2):e12. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1260.
4
Chronic low back pain: non-clinical factors impacting on management by Irish doctors.慢性下腰痛:影响爱尔兰医生治疗的非临床因素
Ir J Med Sci. 2008 Sep;177(3):257-63. doi: 10.1007/s11845-008-0174-7. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
5
Factors affecting the shift towards a 'primary care-led' NHS: a qualitative study. National Health Service.影响向“初级保健主导”的英国国民医疗服务体系转变的因素:一项定性研究。英国国民医疗服务体系
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Nov;52(484):895-900.
6
Case study evaluation.案例研究评估。
BMJ. 1995 Aug 12;311(7002):444-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7002.444.
7
Rigour and qualitative research.严谨性与定性研究。
BMJ. 1995 Jul 8;311(6997):109-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6997.109.
8
Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research.触及其他方法无法触及之处:健康与健康服务研究中的定性方法导论。
BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):42-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6996.42.