• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

案例研究评估。

Case study evaluation.

作者信息

Keen J, Packwood T

机构信息

Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex.

出版信息

BMJ. 1995 Aug 12;311(7002):444-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7002.444.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.311.7002.444
PMID:7640596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2550500/
Abstract

Case study evaluations, using one or more qualitative methods, have been used to investigate important practical and policy questions in health care. This paper describes the features of a well designed case study and gives examples showing how qualitative methods are used in evaluations of health services and health policy.

摘要

案例研究评估采用一种或多种定性方法，已被用于研究医疗保健领域的重要实践和政策问题。本文描述了精心设计的案例研究的特点，并举例说明定性方法在卫生服务和卫生政策评估中的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fa0/2550500/7d13f805bb06/bmj00605-0050-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fa0/2550500/7d13f805bb06/bmj00605-0050-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fa0/2550500/7d13f805bb06/bmj00605-0050-a.jpg

相似文献

1
Case study evaluation.案例研究评估。
BMJ. 1995 Aug 12;311(7002):444-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7002.444.
2
Choosing an appropriate unit of analysis in trials of interventions that attempt to influence practice.在试图影响实践的干预试验中选择合适的分析单位。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999 Jan;4(1):44-8. doi: 10.1177/135581969900400111.
3
The case for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in health services research.卫生服务研究中定性与定量方法相结合的理由。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999 Jan;4(1):39-43. doi: 10.1177/135581969900400110.
4
Qualitative management research in the NHS. A classic case of counting to one?英国国民医疗服务体系中的质性管理研究。这是一个数到一的经典案例吗？
J Health Organ Manag. 2003;17(2):122-37. doi: 10.1108/14777260310476168.
5
Issues arising from the use of qualitative methods in health economics.卫生经济学中定性方法使用所产生的问题。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004 Jul;9(3):171-6. doi: 10.1258/1355819041403286.
6
Measuring health status? A review of the sickness impact and functional limitations profiles.测量健康状况？疾病影响和功能受限概况综述。
Health Care Anal. 1996 Nov;4(4):273-83. doi: 10.1007/BF02249314.
7
Rigour and qualitative research.严谨性与定性研究。
BMJ. 1995 Jul 8;311(6997):109-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6997.109.
8
Quantitative and qualitative research data and their relevance to policy and practice.定量和定性研究数据及其与政策和实践的相关性。
Nurse Res. 2008;15(4):7-14. doi: 10.7748/nr2008.07.15.4.7.c6657.
9
Action research: a systematic review and guidance for assessment.行动研究：评估的系统综述与指南
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(23):iii-157.
10
Evidence for public health policy on inequalities: 2: assembling the evidence jigsaw.关于不平等问题的公共卫生政策证据：2：拼凑证据拼图。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Oct;58(10):817-21. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.015297.

引用本文的文献

1
One Chance to Get it Right: Exploring Perspectives and Experiences in Care Home Discharge Decision-Making in the Acute Hospital.一次做对的机会：探索急症医院养老院出院决策中的观点与经验
Int J Older People Nurs. 2025 Sep;20(5):e70041. doi: 10.1111/opn.70041.
2
Qualitative Methodology in Translational Health Research: Current Practices and Future Directions.转化医学研究中的定性方法：当前实践与未来方向
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 1;11(19):2665. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11192665.
3
Co-ideation and co-design in co-creation research: Reflections from the 'Co-Creating Safe Spaces' project.

本文引用的文献

1
No hiding place: on the discomforts of researching the contemporary policy process.无处可藏：论研究当代政策过程中的种种不适。
J Soc Policy. 1990 Apr;19(2):169-90. doi: 10.1017/s0047279400001987.
2
Qualitative research: Observational methods in health care settings.定性研究：医疗保健环境中的观察方法。
BMJ. 1995 Jul 15;311(6998):182-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6998.182.
3
Rigour and qualitative research.严谨性与定性研究。
共同创造研究中的共同构思和共同设计：来自“共同创造安全空间”项目的思考。
Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1738-1745. doi: 10.1111/hex.13785. Epub 2023 May 31.
4
Does the process of developing products for knowledge mobilisation from healthcare research influence their uptake? A comparative case study.从医疗保健研究中开发用于知识传播的产品的过程会影响其采用情况吗？一项比较案例研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Dec 14;3(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00360-9.
5
Psychiatrization in mental health care: The emergency department.精神卫生保健中的精神病化：急诊科
Front Sociol. 2022 Sep 23;7:793836. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.793836. eCollection 2022.
6
Perception of health-related case studies in the context of introduction to clinical medicine course: students' and teachers' perspective.医学导论课程中健康相关案例研究的感知：学生和教师的视角。
Ir J Med Sci. 2020 Feb;189(1):373-379. doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-02036-1. Epub 2019 May 18.
7
Addressing the gap between public health emergency planning and incident response: Lessons learned from the 2009 H1N1 outbreak in San Diego County.弥合公共卫生应急规划与事件应对之间的差距：从2009年圣地亚哥县甲型H1N1流感疫情中吸取的教训。
Disaster Health. 2013 Jan 1;1(1):13-20. doi: 10.4161/dish.21580. eCollection 2013 Jan-Mar.
8
The orthopaedic trauma patient experience: a qualitative case study of orthopaedic trauma patients in Uganda.骨科创伤患者的经历：乌干达骨科创伤患者的定性案例研究
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 31;9(10):e110940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110940. eCollection 2014.
9
Peer support for stroke survivors: a case study.中风幸存者的同伴支持：一项案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun 16;14:256. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-256.
10
Corruption in the health care sector: A barrier to access of orthopaedic care and medical devices in Uganda.医疗保健领域的腐败：乌干达获得骨科护理和医疗器械的障碍。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2012 May 3;12:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-12-5.
BMJ. 1995 Jul 8;311(6997):109-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6997.109.