• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最后三分之一。研发:我们投资的回报。

The last third. R&D: the return on our investment.

作者信息

Tsuchiyama S

出版信息

Adm Radiol. 1991 Jan;10(1):22-5.

PMID:10109718
Abstract

"The challenge is to balance what is good for the individual against what is in society's best interests without providing disincentives for product development." This quotation from a 1988 JAMA article by Peter Jacobson and John Rosenquist exploring contrast media issues goes beyond the usual scope of concern and also crystallizes why the low osmolar contrast agent (LOCA) controversy is so typical of the dilemmas that healthcare and society as a whole will continue to confront. The first two-thirds of this quotation presents a challenge that has been the subject of the LOCA debate for some time now: how to weigh the benefit to the individual versus the cost to society. The last third of this challenge acknowledges the importance of research and development, which has been largely ignored although it represents a vital ingredient for future healthcare improvements.

摘要

“挑战在于,在不对产品研发造成抑制因素的前提下,平衡对个人有益的因素与符合社会最佳利益的因素。”彼得·雅各布森和约翰·罗森奎斯特1988年发表于《美国医学会杂志》上一篇探讨造影剂问题的文章中的这句话,超出了通常的关注范围,也阐明了为何低渗造影剂(LOCA)争议是医疗保健及整个社会将持续面临的典型困境。这句话的前三分之二提出了一个挑战,这一挑战目前已成为低渗造影剂辩论的主题一段时间了:如何权衡对个人的益处与对社会的成本。这一挑战的最后三分之一承认了研发的重要性,尽管研发是未来医疗保健改善的关键因素,但在很大程度上一直被忽视。

相似文献

1
The last third. R&D: the return on our investment.最后三分之一。研发:我们投资的回报。
Adm Radiol. 1991 Jan;10(1):22-5.
2
Beware the Medical-Industrial Complex.警惕医疗产业联合体。
Oncologist. 1996;1(4):IV-V.
3
[Development of antituberculous drugs: current status and future prospects].[抗结核药物的研发:现状与未来前景]
Kekkaku. 2006 Dec;81(12):753-74.
4
Is there truly a healthcare crisis?是否真的存在医疗保健危机?
Adm Radiol. 1994 Jul;13(7):39-40.
5
Ionic versus nonionic contrast media: a burden or a bargain?离子型与非离子型造影剂:负担还是实惠?
CMAJ. 1990 Sep 15;143(6):475-8.
6
High technology medicine: how defined and how regarded.
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1985 Winter;63(1):141-73.
7
Cost modeling as a technology assessment tool for radiology department capital equipment acquisitions.成本建模作为放射科大型设备购置的技术评估工具。
J Healthc Resour Manag. 1996 Jun;14(5):8-13.
8
Physicians debate change in health care. A healthy challenge for health care.
Health Syst Rev. 1993 Jul-Aug;26(4):19, 21-2.
9
Lifetime earnings patterns, the distribution of future Social Security benefits, and the impact of pension reform.终身收入模式、未来社会保障福利的分配以及养老金改革的影响。
Soc Secur Bull. 2000;63(4):74-98.
10
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.