• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉单词识别过程中的注意力分配。

Allocation of attention during visual word recognition.

作者信息

Becker C A

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1976 Nov;2(4):556-66. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.2.4.556.

DOI:10.1037//0096-1523.2.4.556
PMID:1011005
Abstract

A dual-task paradigm was used to assess attentional processing demands during visual word recognition. By manipulating the difficulty of each task, it is argued that the procedure estimates the attention demands of the memory-access component of word recognition. Specifically, the the complexity of the secondary task was varied from a simple reaction time task to a choice reaction time task, and the difficulty of a lexical decision (word vs. nonword) primary task was varied by manipulating word frequency. A comparison of the effect of secondary task complexity across levels of word frequency showed that the difference between the two secondary tasks was larger for low-frequency words than for high-frequency words. This result, supported by other characteristics of the data, suggests that the memory-access processing in one type of word recognition task does demand attention.

摘要

采用双任务范式来评估视觉单词识别过程中的注意力加工需求。通过操纵每项任务的难度,有人认为该程序可以估计单词识别记忆提取成分的注意力需求。具体而言,次要任务的复杂度从简单反应时任务变化到选择反应时任务,而词汇判断(单词与非单词)主要任务的难度则通过操纵单词频率来改变。对不同单词频率水平下次要任务复杂度的影响进行比较,结果表明,低频词的两种次要任务之间的差异比高频词更大。这一结果得到数据其他特征的支持,表明一种单词识别任务中的记忆提取加工确实需要注意力。

相似文献

1
Allocation of attention during visual word recognition.视觉单词识别过程中的注意力分配。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1976 Nov;2(4):556-66. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.2.4.556.
2
Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.命名和词汇判断中视觉单词识别的注意力资源需求。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 May;18(2):460-70. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.18.2.460.
3
The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.视觉任务难度和注意方向对以失配负波为指标的听觉变化检测的影响。
Brain Res. 2006 Mar 17;1078(1):112-30. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.125. Epub 2006 Feb 21.
4
Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition.词汇歧义与单词识别中注意力分配的时间进程
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1988 Nov;14(4):601-9. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.14.4.601.
5
The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.在测量听力努力的双任务范式中改变次要任务的效果。
Ear Hear. 2014 Nov-Dec;35(6):611-22. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000055.
6
Is lexical access autonomous? Evidence from combining overlapping tasks with recording event-related brain potentials.词汇通达是自主的吗?来自将重叠任务与记录事件相关脑电位相结合的证据。
Brain Res. 2008 Jul 30;1222:156-65. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.05.066. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
7
Attention-dependent allocation of auditory processing resources as measured by mismatch negativity.通过失配负波测量的听觉加工资源的注意依赖分配。
Neuroreport. 1999 Dec 16;10(18):3749-53. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199912160-00005.
8
Effects of central processing on auditory recognition.
J Exp Psychol. 1973 Jan;97(1):51-8. doi: 10.1037/h0033768.
9
Attentional demands of visual word recognition.视觉单词识别的注意力需求。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 Feb;15(1):124-32. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.15.1.124.
10
Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.词汇判断是衡量词汇通达的好方法吗?词频在被忽视的判断阶段中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Jun;10(3):340-57. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.3.340.

引用本文的文献

1
Dividing attention influences contextual facilitation and revision during language comprehension.注意分配对语言理解过程中的语境促进和修正有影响。
Brain Res. 2021 Aug 1;1764:147466. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147466. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
2
Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese.汉语中词汇判断任务与命名任务的频率效应比较
J Vis Exp. 2016 Apr 1(110):e53815. doi: 10.3791/53815.
3
Native-Language Phonological Interference in Early Hakka-Mandarin Bilinguals' Visual Recognition of Chinese Two-Character Compounds: Evidence from the Semantic-Relatedness Decision Task.
早期客家话-普通话双语者对汉语双字复合词视觉识别中的母语语音干扰:来自语义相关性判断任务的证据
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Feb;46(1):57-75. doi: 10.1007/s10936-016-9420-8.
4
Frequency and regularity effects in reading are task dependent: Evidence from ERPs.阅读中的频率和规律性效应取决于任务:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Nov;29(10):1342-1355. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2014.927067.
5
Integrating the automatic and the controlled: strategies in semantic priming in an attractor network with latching dynamics.整合自动与受控:具有锁存动力学的吸引子网络中语义启动的策略
Cogn Sci. 2014 Nov-Dec;38(8):1562-603. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12133. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
6
Phonological recoding in error detection: a cross-sectional study in beginning readers of Dutch.错误检测中的语音编码:一项针对荷兰语初学者的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 30;8(12):e85111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085111. eCollection 2013.
7
Divided attention modulates semantic activation: evidence from a nonletter-level prime task.分散注意力调节语义激活:来自非字母级启动任务的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2007 Dec;35(8):2001-11. doi: 10.3758/bf03192932.
8
The costs and benefits of cross-task priming.跨任务启动的成本与收益。
Mem Cognit. 2007 Jul;35(5):1175-86. doi: 10.3758/bf03193487.
9
Verbal ability modulates the associative neighbors effect.语言能力调节联想邻域效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Feb;14(1):81-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03194032.
10
Orthographic neighbors and visual word recognition.正字法邻接字与视觉单词识别。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2002 May;31(3):289-306. doi: 10.1023/a:1015544213366.