Huntsman Laree A, Lima Susan D
Department of Psychology, San Jose State University, California 95192-0120, USA.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2002 May;31(3):289-306. doi: 10.1023/a:1015544213366.
Two lexical decision experiments, using words that were selected and closely matched on several criteria associated with lexical access provide evidence of facilitatory effects of orthographic neighborhood size and no significant evidence of inhibitory effects of orthographic neighborhood frequency on lexical access. The words used in Experiment 1 had few neighbors that were higher in frequency. In Experiment 2, the words employed had several neighbors that were higher in frequency. Both experiments showed that words possessing few neighbors evoked slower responses than those possessing many neighbors. Also, in both experiments, neighborhood size effects occurred even though words from large neighborhoods had more potentially interfering higher-frequency neighbors than words from small neighborhoods.
两项词汇判断实验使用了根据与词汇通达相关的多个标准挑选并紧密匹配的单词,实验结果表明正字法邻域大小具有促进作用,而没有显著证据表明正字法邻域频率对词汇通达具有抑制作用。实验1中使用的单词几乎没有高频邻词。实验2中使用的单词有几个高频邻词。两项实验均表明,邻词少的单词比邻词多的单词引发的反应更慢。此外,在两项实验中,尽管来自大邻域的单词比来自小邻域的单词有更多潜在干扰性的高频邻词,但邻域大小效应依然存在。