Can J Med Technol. 1991;53(2):68-70.
There was a large volume of feedback and comment on the discussion paper on the future format of RT examinations. Published in the Canadian Journal of Medical Technology, volume 52, #4, 1990. A total of 63 individual submissions was received, of which 12 addressed cytotechnology only and three addressed RT subject examinations. Because many of the responses came from groups, such as faculty liaison committees or instructor groups, some 300 didactic and clinical teaching personnel were involved in the feedback. Submissions were received from 21 of the 31 RT general programs and from six of the nine cytotechnology programs. The responses can therefore be taken as representing a good cross-section of opinion among training program personnel. The feedback was studied recommendation by recommendation, to determine the levels of agreement and disagreement and to summarize the questions, comments and concerns.
关于放射治疗技师考试未来形式的讨论文件收到了大量反馈和评论。该文件发表于《加拿大医学技术杂志》1990年第52卷第4期。共收到63份个人意见书,其中12份仅涉及细胞技术,3份涉及放射治疗技师专业考试。由于许多回复来自教员联络委员会或教师团体等群体,约300名理论与临床教学人员参与了反馈。意见书来自31个放射治疗技师普通项目中的21个,以及9个细胞技术项目中的6个。因此,这些回复可被视为代表了培训项目人员的广泛意见。对反馈意见逐条进行了研究,以确定同意和不同意的程度,并总结问题、评论和关切。