• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种“用户友好型”的实施模式。

A "consumer-friendly" model of implementation.

作者信息

Petr C G

机构信息

School of Social Welfare, University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045.

出版信息

Adm Soc Work. 1991;15(3):67-82. doi: 10.1300/J147v15n03_05.

DOI:10.1300/J147v15n03_05
PMID:10114293
Abstract

Policy analysts and citizen groups have long struggled with the complexities of the implementation process. The model presented here empowers students, community organizers, and consumers with theoretically sound and practically useful procedures for assessing the extent to which social agencies are implementing any particular policy or piece of legislation. It also identifies key implementation processes for citizens to target in their agency change efforts. Specific research results are presented to illustrate the practical utility of the model.

摘要

长期以来,政策分析师和公民团体一直在应对实施过程的复杂性。本文提出的模型为学生、社区组织者和消费者提供了理论上合理且实际有用的程序,以评估社会机构在多大程度上实施任何特定政策或法律条文。它还确定了公民在推动机构变革时应关注的关键实施过程。文中呈现了具体的研究结果,以说明该模型的实际效用。

相似文献

1
A "consumer-friendly" model of implementation.一种“用户友好型”的实施模式。
Adm Soc Work. 1991;15(3):67-82. doi: 10.1300/J147v15n03_05.
2
Consumers' experiences of mental health policymaking.
New Dir Ment Health Serv. 2000 Spring(85):95-103. doi: 10.1002/yd.23320008513.
3
'Wrong parents' and 'right parents': shared perspectives about citizen participation in policy implementation.“错误的父母”和“正确的父母”:关于公民参与政策实施的共同观点。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jun;70(11):1705-13. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.025. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
4
A national survey of "consumer empowerment" at the state level.一项关于州一级“消费者赋权”的全国性调查。
Psychiatr Serv. 1998 Apr;49(4):498-503. doi: 10.1176/ps.49.4.498.
5
A parent's perspective on creating change in legislation.
Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1990;26(2):173-8.
6
When personal turns political. This year's health headlines focused on topics traditionally taboo.
Adv Nurse Pract. 1999 Dec;7(12):37-8, 74.
7
Lessons learned from a Maryland citizen advocacy group's experience in impacting health reform: the seven Cs of effective citizen advocacy.
J Soc Work Disabil Rehabil. 2014;13(1-2):21-30. doi: 10.1080/1536710X.2013.870516.
8
"Freedom of choice" laws: empirical evidence of their contribution to competition in mental health care delivery.
Health Policy Q. 1982 Summer;2(2):79-97.
9
Federal advocacy for anorexia nervosa: an American model.
Int J Eat Disord. 2005;37 Suppl:S101-2. doi: 10.1002/eat.20127.
10
Swings and roundabouts.
Ment Health Today. 2008 May:10-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Early implementation of legislative children's mental health reform: the Minnesota/Hennepin County Experience.儿童心理健康立法改革的早期实施:明尼苏达州/亨内平县的经验
J Ment Health Adm. 1992 Summer;19(2):195-206. doi: 10.1007/BF02521319.