Suppr超能文献

医疗事故诉讼中的专家证人。

The expert witness in malpractice suits.

作者信息

Pate J W, Karnell L H

机构信息

University of Tennessee, Memphis.

出版信息

Bull Am Coll Surg. 1991 Dec;76(12):23-7.

Abstract

This survey of 1,097 Fellows resulted in usable data from 336 surgeons, of whom 129 had claims (n = 212) against them from January 1, 1984, through December 31, 1989. Risk by specialty varied greatly, but population of practice area seemed unimportant. Plaintiff expert witnesses could be identified by 28 surgeons; four of these were from medical school faculties. Defense expert witnesses were identified by 37 surgeons, 18 of whom were from university faculties. We were unable to identify any repeat "itinerant" plaintiffs' expert witnesses from this five-year period in Tennessee. It seems obvious that surgeons, even those who have been sued, pay little attention to even the identification of opposing expert witnesses.

摘要

这项针对1097名会员的调查,得到了336名外科医生的可用数据。在这些外科医生中,从1984年1月1日至1989年12月31日期间,有129人面临索赔(索赔数量为212起)。不同专科的风险差异很大,但执业地区的人口因素似乎并不重要。28名外科医生能确定原告专家证人的身份,其中4人来自医学院教职人员。37名外科医生能确定辩护专家证人的身份,其中18人来自大学教职人员。在田纳西州的这五年期间,我们未能识别出任何重复的“巡回”原告专家证人。很明显,外科医生,即使是那些被起诉的外科医生,对识别对方专家证人的工作也很少关注。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验