Pate J W, Karnell L H
University of Tennessee, Memphis.
Bull Am Coll Surg. 1991 Dec;76(12):23-7.
This survey of 1,097 Fellows resulted in usable data from 336 surgeons, of whom 129 had claims (n = 212) against them from January 1, 1984, through December 31, 1989. Risk by specialty varied greatly, but population of practice area seemed unimportant. Plaintiff expert witnesses could be identified by 28 surgeons; four of these were from medical school faculties. Defense expert witnesses were identified by 37 surgeons, 18 of whom were from university faculties. We were unable to identify any repeat "itinerant" plaintiffs' expert witnesses from this five-year period in Tennessee. It seems obvious that surgeons, even those who have been sued, pay little attention to even the identification of opposing expert witnesses.
这项针对1097名会员的调查,得到了336名外科医生的可用数据。在这些外科医生中,从1984年1月1日至1989年12月31日期间,有129人面临索赔(索赔数量为212起)。不同专科的风险差异很大,但执业地区的人口因素似乎并不重要。28名外科医生能确定原告专家证人的身份,其中4人来自医学院教职人员。37名外科医生能确定辩护专家证人的身份,其中18人来自大学教职人员。在田纳西州的这五年期间,我们未能识别出任何重复的“巡回”原告专家证人。很明显,外科医生,即使是那些被起诉的外科医生,对识别对方专家证人的工作也很少关注。