• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉模拟量表在确定健康状态的社会效用权重方面的有效性。

The validity of a visual analogue scale in determining social utility weights for health states.

作者信息

Nord E

机构信息

National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Health Plann Manage. 1991 Jul-Sep;6(3):234-42. doi: 10.1002/hpm.4740060308.

DOI:10.1002/hpm.4740060308
PMID:10116626
Abstract

Asking people to place health states on a visual analogue scale is a commonly used technique for establishing social utility weights for life years. Recently, the technique has been adopted for setting priorities in the Oregon Medicaid Program in the US; as well as by the Euroqol Group in their development of an instrument meant to serve as a tool for linking cross-national valuations of health states. However, it is unclear what people mean when they value health states on a visual analogue scale. In a series of empirical studies, subjects expressed little depth of intention in relation to the valuations beyond the act of ranking states. Comparisons of the valuations, with valuations elicited by means of the equivalence of numbers technique, indicated that intervals between states on the visual analogue scale must be weighted more the closer they are to the bottom of the scale. This is the same as saying that visual analogue scale values should not be used directly as utility weights for life years. A transformation of the values is needed, and a power function may be suitable for this purpose.

摘要

让人们在视觉模拟量表上对健康状态进行评估,是一种用于确定生命年社会效用权重的常用技术。最近,该技术已被美国俄勒冈医疗补助计划用于确定优先事项;欧洲生活质量小组在开发一种旨在作为连接各国健康状态估值工具的仪器时也采用了该技术。然而,当人们在视觉模拟量表上对健康状态进行估值时,其含义并不明确。在一系列实证研究中,受试者除了对状态进行排序之外,在估值方面几乎没有表现出深入的意图。将这些估值与通过数字等价技术得出的估值进行比较后发现,视觉模拟量表上状态之间的间隔越接近量表底部,其权重就必须越大。这也就是说,视觉模拟量表的值不应直接用作生命年的效用权重。需要对这些值进行转换,幂函数可能适合此目的。

相似文献

1
The validity of a visual analogue scale in determining social utility weights for health states.视觉模拟量表在确定健康状态的社会效用权重方面的有效性。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1991 Jul-Sep;6(3):234-42. doi: 10.1002/hpm.4740060308.
2
EuroQol: health-related quality of life measurement. Valuations of health states by the general public in Norway.欧洲五维度健康量表:与健康相关的生活质量测量。挪威普通公众对健康状态的估值。
Health Policy. 1991 Jun;18(1):25-36. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(91)90141-j.
3
A comparison of scoring weights for the EuroQol derived from patients and the general public.对源自患者和普通公众的欧洲五维健康量表评分权重的比较。
Health Econ. 2001 Jan;10(1):27-37. doi: 10.1002/1099-1050(200101)10:1<27::aid-hec561>3.0.co;2-r.
4
Obtaining disability weights in rural Burkina Faso using a culturally adapted visual analogue scale.使用文化适应性视觉模拟量表在布基纳法索农村地区获取残疾权重。
Health Econ. 2002 Mar;11(2):155-63. doi: 10.1002/hec.658.
5
Aggregating health state valuations.汇总健康状态估值。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997 Jul;2(3):160-5; discussion 166-7.
6
Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in cost-utility analysis?在成本效用分析中使用视觉模拟量表评估是否有依据?
Health Econ. 2006 Jul;15(7):653-64. doi: 10.1002/hec.1086.
7
Social evaluation of health care versus personal evaluation of health states. Evidence on the validity of four health-state scaling instruments using Norwegian and Australian surveys.医疗保健的社会评价与健康状况的个人评价。基于挪威和澳大利亚调查的四种健康状况量表工具有效性的证据。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1993 Fall;9(4):463-78. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300005390.
8
Valuation of EuroQOL (EQ-5D) health states in an adult US sample.美国成年样本中欧洲生活质量五维度量表(EQ-5D)健康状态的评估
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Apr;13(4):421-33. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813040-00005.
9
Valuing health status using VAS and TTO: what lies behind the numbers?使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和时间权衡法(TTO)评估健康状况:数字背后隐藏着什么?
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Oct;45(8):1289-97. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00057-9.
10
A social preference valuations set for EQ-5D health states in Flanders, Belgium.比利时佛兰德地区的 EQ-5D 健康状态社会偏好值集。
Eur J Health Econ. 2010 Apr;11(2):205-13. doi: 10.1007/s10198-009-0167-0. Epub 2009 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical prioritization based on decision model outcomes is not sensitive to differences between the health-related quality of life values estimates of physicians and citizens.基于决策模型结果的手术优先级排序对医生和公民的健康相关生活质量价值评估之间的差异不敏感。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Feb;33(2):529-539. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03544-5. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
2
Observational study of health utilities in adult primary ciliary dyskinesia patients: preliminary data on associations with molecular diagnosis, clinical phenotype and HRQOL measures.成人原发性纤毛运动障碍患者健康效用的观察性研究:与分子诊断、临床表型和健康相关生活质量测量指标关联的初步数据
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2022 Dec 20;17:881. doi: 10.4081/mrm.2022.881. eCollection 2022 Jan 12.
3
Shoulder conditions and health related quality of life and utility: a current concepts review.肩部疾病与健康相关生活质量及效用:当前概念综述
JSES Int. 2021 Nov 20;6(1):167-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.10.006. eCollection 2022 Jan.
4
Reflections on key methodological decisions in national burden of disease assessments.关于国家疾病负担评估中关键方法学决策的思考
Arch Public Health. 2020 Dec 31;78(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-00519-7.
5
Patients' Self-Reported Disability Weights of Top-Ranking Diseases in Thailand: Do They Differ by Socio-Demographic and Illness Characteristics?泰国排名前几位疾病的患者自评残疾权重:它们是否因社会人口学和疾病特征而有所不同?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 2;17(5):1595. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051595.
6
Investigating Gains in Neurocognition in an Intervention Trial of Exercise (IGNITE): Protocol.调查神经认知增益的干预试验(IGNITE):方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Oct;85:105832. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105832. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
7
A Norwegian 15D value algorithm: proposing a new procedure to estimate 15D value algorithms.挪威 15D 值算法:提出一种新的 15D 值算法估计方法。
Qual Life Res. 2019 May;28(5):1129-1143. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2043-9. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
8
A tale of two countries: comparing disability weights for gambling problems in New Zealand and Australia.两国故事:比较新西兰和澳大利亚赌博问题的残疾权重。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Sep;27(9):2361-2371. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1882-8. Epub 2018 May 17.
9
Disability Weights for Chronic Mercury Intoxication Resulting from Gold Mining Activities: Results from an Online Pairwise Comparisons Survey.金矿开采活动导致的慢性汞中毒的残疾权重:在线成对比较调查结果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jan 10;14(1):57. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14010057.
10
Review of disability weight studies: comparison of methodological choices and values.残疾权重研究综述:方法选择与数值比较
Popul Health Metr. 2014 Aug 23;12:20. doi: 10.1186/s12963-014-0020-2. eCollection 2014.