• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诉讼中的医疗记录:达康盾节育器事件

Medical records in litigation: the Dalkon Shield story.

作者信息

Byrne K

出版信息

AMRO. 1992 Feb;32(5):11-4.

PMID:10117045
Abstract

The Dalkon Shield was manufactured by A.H. Robins Inc. in the early and mid seventies, before it was withdrawn from sale because of the influx of lawsuits against the manufacturers. The case has become the largest tort case in history, with approximately 200,000 claimants worldwide and will not be wound up for years to come. Slater and Gordon is an Australian firm of solicitors with offices in three states. They have the largest Dalkon Shield practice in the world and represent almost 3,000 claimants. One of their most difficult tasks in preparing the cases is the gathering of medical evidence to substantiate claimants' assertions. This entails collecting relevant medical records from across the country and around the world going back almost twenty years for almost 2,000 women. The project has magnified the importance of accurate and complete documentation, kept intact and made accessible. The influence of medical record administrators is highlighted.

摘要

达康盾由A.H.罗宾斯公司于70年代初和中期生产,后因针对制造商的诉讼大量涌入而停止销售。该案件已成为历史上最大的侵权案件,全球约有20万索赔人,未来数年都不会结案。斯莱特和戈登是一家澳大利亚律师事务所,在三个州设有办事处。他们处理达康盾案件的规模居世界之首,代理了近3000名索赔人。他们在准备案件时最艰巨的任务之一是收集医学证据以证实索赔人的主张。这需要从全国乃至世界各地收集近20年的相关医疗记录,涉及近2000名女性。该项目凸显了准确完整的文档记录保持完整并便于获取的重要性。病案管理人员的影响力也得到了凸显。

相似文献

1
Medical records in litigation: the Dalkon Shield story.诉讼中的医疗记录:达康盾节育器事件
AMRO. 1992 Feb;32(5):11-4.
2
Was the Dalkon Shield a safe and effective intrauterine device? The conflict between case-control and clinical trial study findings.“达康盾”宫内节育器是一种安全有效的节育器吗?病例对照研究结果与临床试验研究结果之间的冲突。
Fertil Steril. 1992 Jun;57(6):1151-76. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55068-7.
3
The Dalkon Shield debate.达康盾争议
Conn Med. 1983 Mar;47(3):138-41.
4
The Dalkon Shield in perspective.透视下的达康盾节育环。 (注:“Dalkon Shield”是一种曾在市场上出现过的节育环品牌,该名称具体翻译可能因行业习惯等有不同,这里给出一种常见理解。)
Med Law. 1986;5(1):35-44.
5
Will new IUD debate lower Dalkon Shield settlements?新型宫内节育器的争论会降低达康盾(节育器品牌)的和解金额吗?
Contracept Technol Update. 1991 Jul;12(7):102-4.
6
The rise and fall and rise of the IUD.宫内节育器的兴衰起伏。
Am J Gynecol Health. 1989 May-Jun;3(3-S):6-10.
7
[The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?].[美国宫内节育器市场的终结:这对美国女性意味着什么?]
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris). 1987 Mar;15(3):291-300.
8
The Dalkon Shield.达康盾节育环
FDA Consum. 1975 Feb;9(1):21.
9
Letter: Dalkon shield and septic abortion.信件:达康盾节育器与感染性流产
Med J Aust. 1975 Jan 18;1(3):81.
10
An association between the Dalkon Shield and complicated pregnancies among women hospitalized for intrauterine contraceptive device--related disorders.在因宫内节育器相关疾病住院的女性中,达康盾与复杂妊娠之间的关联。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 May 1;125(1):83-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(76)90897-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Half a century of the oral contraceptive pill: historical review and view to the future.口服避孕药的半个世纪:历史回顾与未来展望
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Dec;58(12):e757-60.
2
A review of barriers and myths preventing the more widespread use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women.关于阻碍未生育女性更广泛使用宫内节育器的障碍和误解的综述。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2012 Oct;17(5):340-50. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2012.700744. Epub 2012 Jul 26.