Saito T
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Tokushima, Japan.
HEC Forum. 1992;4(4):281-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00057793.
The present features and functions of ethics committees in 80 Japanese medical schools were surveyed by employing questionnaires. Seventy-nine schools had already established committees on each campus (however, the ethics committee at Kitasato Medical University was formally established after the completion of this survey). The major role of Japanese ethics committees may be said roughly to correspond to that of Institutional Review Boards (IRB) in the U.S., although ethics committees have other functions as well. Among the ethics committees' many problems, two significant weaknesses should be underscored. The first is the inappropriate composition of the membership of the committees: more non-campus members, younger professionals, and women should be invited to participate. The second concern is the committees' essentially closed review process: this process has not been adequately open to the public even in cases in which the issue of the patient's confidentiality does not arise. However, several schools are now preparing to open their meetings to non-members and this policy should improve the present situation. It is fortunate, however, that the ethics committees in Japan's medical schools were established by members from each campus and not as a response to national directives or legislation.
通过问卷调查对日本80所医学院校伦理委员会的现状及职能进行了调查。79所学校在各校区均已设立了委员会(不过,北里大学医学部的伦理委员会在本次调查结束后才正式成立)。日本伦理委员会的主要作用大致可认为与美国的机构审查委员会(IRB)相当,不过伦理委员会还有其他职能。在伦理委员会的诸多问题中,有两个显著的薄弱环节需要强调。一是委员会成员构成不当:应邀请更多校外成员、年轻专业人员和女性参与。二是委员会的审查过程基本封闭:即使在不涉及患者保密问题的情况下,这一过程也未充分向公众开放。不过,有几所学校目前正准备向非成员开放会议,这一政策应会改善当前状况。幸运的是,日本医学院校的伦理委员会是由各校区成员设立的,而非因国家指令或立法而设立。