• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每项收费对全科医生行为的影响。

The effect of per-item fees on the behaviour of general practitioners.

作者信息

Hughes D, Yule B

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen, UK.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 1992 Dec;11(4):413-37. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(92)90014-r.

DOI:10.1016/0167-6296(92)90014-r
PMID:10124311
Abstract

The recent government White Paper 'Working for Patients' emphasised the use of financial incentives as a means of altering the behaviour of general practitioners (GPs) in the U.K. This paper examines the impact of financial incentives on GPs' behaviour with respect to maternity care and cervical cytology. Changes in per-item fees over the period 1966-89 appear to have had little effect on the numbers of treatments; rather service provision was related to patient demand and the availability of GPs. However, target payments for cervical cytology introduced in 1990 appear to have had a major impact.

摘要

英国政府近期的白皮书《为患者服务》强调利用经济激励措施来改变英国全科医生(GP)的行为。本文研究了经济激励措施对全科医生在产妇护理和宫颈细胞学方面行为的影响。1966年至1989年期间每项费用的变化似乎对治疗数量影响不大;相反,服务提供与患者需求和全科医生的可获得性有关。然而,1990年引入的宫颈细胞学目标支付似乎产生了重大影响。

相似文献

1
The effect of per-item fees on the behaviour of general practitioners.每项收费对全科医生行为的影响。
J Health Econ. 1992 Dec;11(4):413-37. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(92)90014-r.
2
Relative fees and the utilization of physicians' services in Canada.加拿大的相对费用与医生服务的利用情况
Health Econ. 1995 Nov-Dec;4(6):419-38. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730040601.
3
Physician response to Medicare fee reductions: changes in the volume of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgeries in the Medicare and private sectors.医生对医疗保险费用削减的反应:医疗保险和私营部门冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)手术量的变化。
J Health Econ. 1998 Dec;17(6):675-99. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(98)00024-1.
4
Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? ACCEPt-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol.当经济激励措施以及外部审计与反馈被取消后,全科医疗中的预防保健活动能否持续开展?可接受性:一项整群随机对照试验方案。
Implement Sci. 2016 Sep 13;11(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0489-0.
5
A problem with consumer surplus measures of the cost of practice variations.
J Health Econ. 1995 Jun;14(2):243-51. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(95)00005-3.
6
How do doctors behave when some (but not all) of their patients are in managed care?当医生的部分(而非全部)患者参加管理式医疗时,他们会有怎样的表现?
J Health Econ. 2002 Mar;21(2):337-53. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00131-x.
7
Incentive payments to general practitioners aimed at increasing opportunistic testing of young women for chlamydia: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.激励全科医生对年轻女性进行衣原体机会性检测的激励支付:一项试点整群随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Feb 17;10:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-70.
8
GPs: working harder than ever.全科医生:工作比以往任何时候都更努力。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 May;68(670):218-219. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695873.
9
New medicines in primary care: a review of influences on general practitioner prescribing.基层医疗中的新药:对全科医生处方影响的综述
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2008 Feb;33(1):1-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00875.x.
10
Financial incentives and primary care provision in Britain: do general practitioners maximise their income?英国的经济激励措施与初级医疗服务:全科医生是否实现了收入最大化?
Dev Health Econ Public Policy. 1998;6:191-210. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5681-7_10.

引用本文的文献

1
How Social Preferences Shape Incentives in (Experimental) Markets for Credence Goods.社会偏好如何塑造(实验性)信任品市场中的激励机制。
Econ J (London). 2017 Mar;127(600):393-416. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12284. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
2
Qualitative study of pilot payment aimed at increasing general practitioners' antismoking advice to smokers.旨在增加全科医生对吸烟者戒烟建议的试点支付定性研究。
BMJ. 2001 Aug 25;323(7310):432-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7310.432.
3
Target payments in primary care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.
基层医疗中的目标支付:对专业实践和医疗保健结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;1999(3):CD000531. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000531.